The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Uday R. Popat , Rohtesh S. Mehta , Roland Bassett , Amanda Leigh Olson , Amin Majid Alousi , Paolo Anderlini , Gheath Alatrash , Qaiser Bashir , Stefan O. Ciurea , Chitra Hosing , Partow Kebriaei , Issa F. Khouri , David Marin , Yago Nieto , Betul Oran , Katayoun Rezvani , Muzaffar H. Qazilbash , Elizabeth J. Shpall , Richard E. Champlin , Borje Andersson
Background: Myeloablative stem cell transplants have a lower rate of relapse than reduced intensity regimens. Timed sequential busulfan (TSB) with fludarabine (Flu) is a promising myeloablative regimen for patients undergoing matched sibling (MSD) or unrelated (MUD) donor transplantation (HCT) with low non-relapse mortality (NRM) (Popat et al Lancet Haematology 2018), but was not tested in haploidentical (haplo). Also, whether this approach can be used with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in MSD, MUD and haplo HCT is unknown. To address these issues, we conducted a prospective phase II study. Methods: Patients with hematological malignancies with MSD, MUD or haplo donor were eligible. They received fixed doses of Busulfan(BU) 80mg/m2 either on day -13 and -12 (n=45) or on -20 and -13 (n=10). Then, Flu 40mg/m2 was given on day -6 to -2 followed by Bu dosed to achieve target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 umol/min for the whole course based on pharmacokinetic studies. Thiotepa 5mg/kg was given on day -7 to haplo group. GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy 50mg/kg on day 3 and 4 and tacrolimus. Haplo and later MUD recipients also received mycophenolate mofetil. Results: 55 patients with a median age of 47 (15-65) years were enrolled. 30 patients had AML or MDS, 9 CML or MPD, 5 lymphoma, 5 myeloma and 6 ALL. About half had haplo 26 (47%); others had MUD 18 (33%) or MSD 11(20%). Disease risk index was high in 18 (32%), intermediate in 32 (58%), and low in 5 (9%) patients. Comorbidity score was ≥3 in 22 (40%) patients. With a median follow up of 17 months (5-28), 1-year OS, PFS, NRM and relapse rates were 71% (60-84%), 63% (51-77%), 20% (9-31%), and 17% (7-27%), respectively [Table]. There were no graft failures. Day 100 grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD rates were 38% (25-51%) and 9% (95% CI 1-17%), respectively; 1-year chronic GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD rates were 10% (2-28%) and 8% (0-15%), respectively. 1-year OS in MSD, MUD and haplo groups were 91% (75-100%), 72% (54-96%), and 62% (45-83%) respectively (P=0.11). Conclusions: Myeloablative TSB with PTCy is feasible in MSD, MUD and haplo HCT. It lowers the incidence of severe acute and chronic GVHD without apparent increase in relapse. Clinical trial information: NCT02861417
Results (N=55) | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|
OS, 1 yr. | 71% | (60-84%) |
MSD (N=11) | 91% | (75-100%) |
MUD (N=18) | 72% | (54-96%) |
Haplo (N=26) | 62% | (45-83%) |
PFS, 1 yr. | 63% | (51-77%) |
Relapse, 1 yr. | 17% | (7-27%) |
NRM, 1 year | 20% | (9-31%) |
Acute GVHD II-IV | 38% | (25-51%) |
Acute GVHD III-IV | 9% | (1-17%) |
Chronic GVHD, 1 yr. | 10% | (2-18%) |
Extensive Chronic GVHD | 8% | (0-15%) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Uday R. Popat
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Maha Hameed
2014 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Renju V. Raj
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Andrew J Yee