Randomized phase II trial of a DNA vaccine encoding prostatic acid phosphatase (pTVG-HP) versus GM-CSF adjuvant in patients with PSA-recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors

Glenn Liu

Glenn Liu

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

Glenn Liu , Emmanuel S. Antonarakis , Jens C. Eickhoff , Ellen G. Wargowski , Laura E. Johnson , Robert Jeraj , Douglas G. McNeel , Lawrence Fong

Organizations

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Other Government Agency
Madison Vaccines, Inc

Background: Phase I/II studies of pTVG-HP showed safety and increases in prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP)-specific T cells. Based on these, we conducted a multi-center, randomized phase II trial using pTVG-HP with GM-CSF adjuvant vs GM-CSF alone in patients with PSA-recurrent, non-metastatic, non-castrate, prostate cancer (stage M0). Methods: 99 patients with M0 prostate cancer (negative CT and bone scan) with PSA doubling time (DT) of < 12m were randomly assigned to pTVG-HP + GM-CSF vs GM-CSF. Treatments were every 2 wk x 6, and then quarterly for up to 24m. Primary endpoint was 2-year MFS. Secondary endpoints included median MFS, changes in PSA DT, and immune response to PAP antigen. Additional analysis included quantitative changes in bone lesion activity by NaF PET/CT. Results: Few grade 3/4 events were observed and were not statistically different between arms. 2-year MFS between control and pTVG-HP was 42.3% and 41.8% (p = 0.97). Median MFS was not different (18.3m control versus 18.9m pTVG-HP, HR = 1.6, p = 0.13). Changes in PSA DT, and immunity to the PAP target, were not different between study arms. A pre-planned subset analysis showed median MFS was significantly longer in patients with rapid PSA DT ( < 3m) treated with pTVG-HP (6.1m versus 12.0m, n = 21, HR = 4.4, p = 0.03). In patients with baseline metastases detected on NaF PET/CT, total activity (SUVtotal) increased 17% with GM-CSF alone, but decreased 29% with pTVG-HP from baseline to month 6 (n = 27, p = 0.07). Conclusions: This trial did not demonstrate an overall increase in 2-year MFS following treatment with pTVG-HP, but suggested a modest effect in patients with rapidly progressive disease. NaF PET/CT imaging suggests that pTVG-HP has a detectable effect on decreasing metastatic activity in bone. A separate trial suggests that pTVG-HP is an immune activating agent that improves activity of PD-1 blockade. A trial using pTVG-HP in combination with nivolumab in patients with M0 prostate cancer is currently underway. Clinical trial information: NCT01341652

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01341652

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 5037)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.5037

Abstract #

5037

Poster Bd #

149

Abstract Disclosures