A retrospective analysis of venous thromboembolism trends in chemotherapy-induced anemia: Red blood cell transfusion versus erythrocyte stimulating agent (ESA) administration.

Authors

null

Emily Jane Bryer

Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

Emily Jane Bryer , David H. Henry

Organizations

Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Anemia is a common and unfortunate consequence of chemotherapy; patients receiving a variety of chemotherapy regimens often develop chemotherapy–induced anemia (CIA), which contributes to poor outcomes including increased mortality. Prompt and effective treatment of CIA is essential to prevent fewer chemotherapy dose delays and reductions. Optimal therapy of CIA is controversial and involves the solitary and combined use of intravenous iron, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs). Despite the baseline coagulopathies present in patients with malignancy, administration of both RBC transfusions and ESAs is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). It remains unknown whether the risk of VTE in patients with CIA is greater among patients who receive RBC transfusions or ESAs. Methods: A retrospective single-institution study analyzed 7360 patients with varying malignancies who developed CIA and received ESAs and RBC transfusion from 1998-2017. These patients were evaluated for subsequent development of VTE and categorized by prior receipt of RBC transfusion or ESA. Results: Among the 7360 patients with CIA, 5503 received either RBC transfusion or ESA and 1857 received both. Among all patients, 3466/7360 (47.1%) developed a VTE. The absolute risk of developing a VTE with receipt of a RBC transfusion was 0.38 compared to 0.19 with ESA. Patients with CIA who received RBC had twice the risk of developing a VTE compared with those who received ESA (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: While both RBC transfusion and ESA administration are independently associated with VTE, our data suggests a greater risk of VTE development with RBC transfusion as compared with ESA administration.

VTENo VTEAbsolute Risk
Receipt of RBC33283308
Receipt of ESA1622959
Receipt of both RBC + ESA1484373
Receipt of only RBC184429350.38
Receipt of only ESA1385860.19
Statistical SignificanceChi-square 104.01 with p < 0.0001

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics and Tumor Biology (Nonimmuno): Publication Only

Track

Developmental Therapeutics—Molecularly Targeted Agents and Tumor Biology

Sub Track

Other Developmental Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr e14685)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e14685

Abstract #

e14685

Abstract Disclosures