Background: Preserved fertility after cancer is a priority for female survivors and their families. Embryo/oocyte cryopreservation are standard of care (SOC) for post-pubertal females. Experimental ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is the only current option for pre-pubertal girls. We surveyed COG sites about their FP infrastructure and practices. Methods: A REDcap survey was emailed to one individual previously identified as knowledgeable about FP or the Principal Investigator at each COG site. Site specific factors associated with outcomes were determined using logistic regression. All study procedures were IRB-approved. Results: Responses were received from 144 of 220 sites (65%). Discussions about fertility at diagnosis were reported as routinely held with all females “at risk” of infertility, all post pubertal females, and all females at 113 (78%), 94 (65%), and 65 (45%) of sites respectively. Embryo/oocyte cryopreservation was offered at 95 (70%) institutions and independently associated with large (>120 new patients/year) sites (OR 6.0 95%CI 1.6-22.8) and presence of a FP navigator/team (OR 4.7 95%CI 1.7-13.5). OTC was offered at 64 (48%) sites: 34 (25%) by referral to another institution, 18 (13%) under an IRB protocol, and 12 (9%) as a clinical service. OTC accessibility was associated with large sites (OR 3.2 95% CI 1.1-8.9) and a FP navigator/team (OR 3.2 95%CI 1.4-7.0). A total of 102/133 (77%) sites use gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) for any indication; 90 (68%) for menstrual suppression, 75 (56%) with the goal of ovarian suppression for fertility preservation, and 27 (20%) for contraception. Conclusions: Variation in FP services exists across COG. Discussion of infertility risk is not universal. The availability of OTC at treating institutions is limited. The presence of an FP navigator/team is a modifiable factor associated with greater likelihood of accessing SOC and experimental options. Despite conflicting evidence and lack of endorsement from professional societies, GnRHa’s are commonly used for FP. These survey results suggest FP services remain inadequate but highlight opportunities for improvement and areas of needed research.