Background: ICIs have revolutionized treatment for mRCC; however there are limited predictive biomarkers for response to ICIs. PD-L1 status is still controversial, demonstrating little predictive utility in mRCC. TMB is predictive for response to ICIs in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but has not been validated in mRCC. Here, we assess the correlations between TMB and PD-L1 status with outcomes to ICI treatment in mRCC. Methods: 34 patients (pts) with mRCC who had previously received ICIs at Duke Cancer Institute were identified. Tumor samples were retrospectively evaluated using a Personal Genome Diagnostics Assay for somatic variants across > 500 genes, as well as TMB and microsatellite status. PD-L1 status was tested via the Dako 28-8 PD-L1 IHC assay. Deidentified clinical information was extracted from the medical record and tumor response was evaluated based on RECIST criteria. Results: Pts were grouped by overall response following ICI therapy into either progressive disease (“PD”, n = 18) or disease control group (“DC”, n = 16), defined as either stable disease, partial response, or complete response. Pts displayed a TMB range from 0.36 to 12.24 mutations/Mb with a mean score of 2.83 muts/Mb, with no significant difference between the PD and DC groups (mean 3.01 muts/Mb vs. 2.63 muts/Mb, p > 0.05). 9 of 32 evaluable samples were PD-L1 positive, with 4 in the PD group and 5 in the DC group. Notably, the DC group displayed a significant enrichment of mutations in genes affiliated with DNA repair (including BRCA1, BRCA2, FANCA, FANCB, FANCG, FANCM, MSH3, MSH6, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54B, RECQL4, and SLX4; p = 0.0444). DNA damage gene mutations were found in 8/10 (80%) metastatic tumor specimens and 14/24 (58%) primary tumors. Conclusions: Overall, in this mRCC cohort, neither TMB nor PD-L1 correlated with patient outcomes or with ICI response. Furthermore, high TMB was not significantly associated with PD-L1 expression within the samples. The higher frequency of mutations in DNA repair genes in the DC group suggests potential use as a predictive signature for ICI response, warranting future prospective studies. Further studies with matched primary-metastatic samples would be beneficial to determine if DNA repair mutations occur more frequently in metastatic versus primary tumor specimens.