Mixed invasive ductal-lobular carcinoma: Clinicopathological characterization and clinical outcomes.

Authors

null

Azadeh Nasrazadani

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA

Azadeh Nasrazadani , Yujia Li , George Tseng , Jennifer Xavier , Sarah Hugar , Adrian V. Lee , Peter C. Lucas , Rachel Catherine Jankowitz , Steffi Oesterreich , Priscilla F. McAuliffe

Organizations

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, NSABP, and The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Mixed Invasive Ductal-Lobular Carcinoma (IDC-L) is a histological subtype of invasive breast carcinoma comprised of both ductal and lobular morphologies. There is limited information on the relative proportions of the individual components in IDC-L and on outcomes compared to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Methods: Clinical information was abstracted from 16,308 patients with invasive breast cancer seen at UPMC Magee Women’s Hospital from 1990-2017 using the UPMC Network Cancer Registry. A systematic chart review was performed on a subset of patients annotated with IDC-L (n=806); however, a thorough review of pathology reports led to the exclusion of all but 408 patients for further analysis, due to the lack of a standardized definition of IDC-L. Of the 408 cases, 92% were estrogen receptor (ER)+. Survival of patients with ER+ IDC-L (n=376) was compared to ER+ IDC (n=9,716) and ER+ ILC (1,465). For a subset of IDC-L cases (n=54), distributions of individual subtype components were abstracted from pathology reports. Results: IDC-L made up 2.5% of the total cases (408/16,308). IDC-L tumors were on average 31% ductal and 69% lobular (p =0.001). Survival analysis showed worse disease free survival (DFS) (p=0.05) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.002) in patients with ER+ ILC compared to ER+ IDC, with ER+ IDC-L patients showing a median OS superior to ILC yet inferior to IDC counterparts (ns). Conclusions: Identification of patients with IDC-L through cancer registry protocols representative of standard practices by national cancer registries revealed a lack of a standardized definition of mixed IDC-L. Reliance on accuracy of these diagnoses calls in to question the reliability of prior clinico-pathologic analyses reported on this topic. DFS and OS of IDC-L patients falls between that of IDC and ILC patients while ILC patients showed significantly worse outcome. The predominant distribution of lobular morphology in IDC-L tumors suggests this subtype may have additional characteristics similar to lobular rather than ductal carcinomas. Comprehensive clinical and molecular characterization of a carefully identified IDC-L cohort is underway.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic: Publication Only

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Hormone Receptor-Positive

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr e12531)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e12531

Abstract #

e12531

Abstract Disclosures