c-Met expression and response to telisotuzumab vedotin (teliso-v) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors

null

Rebecca Suk Heist

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Rebecca Suk Heist , Monica Motwani , Fabrice Barlesi , Jonathan Wade Goldman , Karen Kelly , Yan Sun , Jun Wu , Bruce Allen Bach , D. Ross Camidge

Organizations

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, Aix Marseille University, APHM, Marseille Early Phases Cancer Trials Center CLIP, Marseille, France, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: c-Met overexpression (OE) and MET amplification (amp) are prognostic of poor outcome for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Telisotuzumab vedotin (ABBV-399; teliso-v [T]), an anti–c-Met Ab and monomethyl auristatin E drug conjugate, showed efficacy as monotherapy (mono) and combined with erlotinib (T+Er) in a phase 1/1b trial (NCT02099058) in NSCLC patients (pts) with c-Met OE. Here, c-Met OE (by immunohistochemistry [IHC]) and its association with T efficacy were explored. IHC, mRNA, and amp platforms for MET were also compared. Methods: Archival tissue from pts with NSCLC in the phase 1/1b trial was examined. c-Met was assessed centrally by IHC with SP44 Ab (Ventana Medical Systems) and pts with c-Met OE (membrane H-score [H-S] of ≥150) were enrolled. MET mRNA expression was analyzed from total RNA and sequenced on HiSeq 3000 (Illumina). MET amp was analyzed by FISH (MET/CEP7 ratio of ≥2) or whole-exome sequencing (copy number ≥2). Efficacy in the T mono every 2 (TQ2W) or 3 (TQ3W) weeks and the T+Er EGFR mutant cohorts was assessed for IHC H-S ≥150 and ≥225. Results: As of Dec 2018, 238 pts with NSCLC were screened centrally for c-Met OE. Of these, 118 pts were enrolled. For screened pts, 76%/37% of nonsquamous (NSQ, n = 201) and 58%/16% of squamous (SQ, n = 32) pts had H-S ≥150/≥225; 75%/41% of NSQ and 55%/16% of SQ NSCLC pts had ≥50% cells with 2+/3+ staining intensity. MET amp was reported for 5 pts, all with high H-S (≥270); there was an association between MET amp and MET RNA levels (n = 4) (t-test p value: 0.0002). See Table for ORR and median PFS by H-S and T treatment. Conclusions: c-Met expression prevalence in NSCLC showed a similar trend as in previous reports. In T+Er-treated pts, ORR was higher for those with c-Met H-S ≥225 than ≥150–< 225, suggesting that biomarker expression may act as an effect size multiplier. Optimization of the c-Met IHC cutoff warrants further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02099058

H-SNSQ,
TQ2W
NSQ,
TQ3W
EGFR mutant,
T+Er
NORR, %PFS, m
(CI)
NORR, %PFS, m
(CI)
NORR, %PFS, m
(CI)
≥1501637.55.2
(1.7, 8.8)
1711.82.7
(1.2, NA)
2835.75.3
(2.8, NA)
    ≥150–< 225933.35.2
(0.7, NA)
9111.4
(1.1, NA)
1216.73.7
(1.4, NA)
    ≥225742.98.0
(1.2, 9.1)
812.5NR
(1.2, NA)
1650NR
(2.7, NA)

NA, not available; NR, not reached.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02099058

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 9023)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.9023

Abstract #

9023

Poster Bd #

346

Abstract Disclosures