ml-RECIST: Machine learning to estimate RECIST in patients with NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 blockade.

Authors

Kathryn Arbour

Kathryn Cecilia Arbour

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Kathryn Cecilia Arbour , Luu Anh Tuan , Hira Rizvi , Adam Yala , Matthew David Hellmann , Regina Barzilay

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly important for discovery and may be an opportunity for regulatory approval. Effective use of RWE relies on determining treatment-specific outcomes, such as overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), which are challenging to accurately evaluate retrospectively and at scale. We hypothesized the use of machine learning of text radiology reports from patients with NSCLC treated with PD-1 blockade could be used to train a model that estimates RECIST-defined outcomes. Methods: 2753 imaging reports from 453 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1 blockade were collected and separated into independent training (80%, n = 362) and validation (20%, n = 92) cohorts. Reports were limited to interval of PD-1 blockade. RECIST reads performed by thoracic radiologists on all patients served as “gold standard” to determine ORR, occurrence of, and date of progression. Baseline reports were compared to all follow up reports to determine machine-learning RECIST (ml-RECIST). A four layers neural-network model for classification was proposed to solve the three above tasks. Results: In the training cohort, ml-RECIST best estimated ORR by RECIST (accuracy CR/PR 84%, SD 82%, POD 91%). ml-RECIST estimated PFS by RECIST accurately predicting progression occurred at any time (86%) and exact progression date (65%). Date of progression was closely correlated (Pearson’s r coefficient = 0.91, 95% CI:0.89-0.94, p < 0.001) in patients determined to have progressed by both methods. Similar accuracy of ml-RECIST was observed in the validation cohort (accuracy CR/PR 84%, SD 80%, POD 90%; progression occurred 86%, progression date 72%). Accuracy was consistent when RECIST reads were performed prospectively as part of clinical trials vs retrospectively for standard of care treatment (e.g. CR/PR 82% vs 88%, respectively). ml-RECIST-defined response similarly determined improvement in overall survival compared to RECIST (HR = 0.19, p < 0.001 vs HR = 0.26, p < 0.001 respectively). Conclusions: Machine learning-RECIST ("ml-RECIST") accurately estimates outcomes using imaging text reports. ml-RECIST may be tool to determine outcomes expeditiously and at scale for use in RWE studies, enabling more useful and reliable applications of large clinical databases.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 9052)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.9052

Abstract #

9052

Poster Bd #

375

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Deep learning to estimate RECIST in cancer patients treated in real-world settings.

First Author: Irbaz Bin Riaz

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Machine learning prediction of progression events in oncology RECIST 1.1 clinical trials.

First Author: Erin Bowman