Christie NHS, Manchester, United Kingdom
Wasat Mansoor , Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau , Maria Alsina , Kohei Shitara , Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz Tejani , Peter C. Thuss-Patience , Sinead Cuffe , Mikhail Dvorkin , David Park , Takayuki Ando , Marc Van Den Eynde , Giordano D. Beretta , Alberto Zaniboni , Toshihiko Doi , Josep Tabernero , David H. Ilson , Lukas Makris , Sandra McGuigan , Eric Van Cutsem
Background: The incidence of GEJC is increasing in North America and Europe, especially among white men. Many pts present with metastatic disease or relapse locally or systemically after resection of early-stage disease. The global phase 3 study TAGS (NCT02500043) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in previously treated pts with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC)/mGEJC. Here we report results in the mGEJC subgroup from TAGS. Methods: Pts with mGC/mGEJC treated with ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized (2:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 BID on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28-day cycle) or placebo, plus best supportive care. A preplanned efficacy and safety analysis was performed in pts with mGEJC. Results: Of 507 randomized pts, 145 (29%) had GEJC as the sole primary disease site (FTD/TPI, 98/337; placebo, 47/170). Of pts with mGEJC, 85% were male and 83% were white (overall population, 73% and 70%). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced for pts with mGEJC across treatment groups, except for fewer pts having prior gastrectomy (40% vs 55%) and more pts having received ≥3 prior regimens (74% vs 66%) in the FTD/TPI group than in the placebo group. FTD/TPI had an efficacy benefit in pts with mGEJC, and the FTD/TPI safety profile was similar in this subgroup and the overall population (table). Conclusions: FTD/TPI showed a manageable safety profile and efficacy benefit in pts with mGEJC in the TAGS trial, despite heavier pretreatment of the FTD/TPI than the placebo group. Clinical trial information: NCT02500043
Overall population1 | mGEJC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
FTD/TPI | Placebo | FTD/TPI | Placebo | |
ITT population, n | 337 | 170 | 98 | 47 |
Median OS, mo | 5.7 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 3.5 |
HR (95% CI) | 0.69 (0.56–0.85) | 0.75 (0.50–1.11) | ||
Median PFS, mo | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
HR (95% CI) | 0.57 (0.47–0.70) | 0.60 (0.41–0.88) | ||
Safety population, n | 335 | 168 | 97 | 46 |
Grade ≥3 AEs of any cause, % | ||||
Any | 80 | 58 | 77 | 59 |
Most commona | ||||
Neutropeniab | 34 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
Anemiac | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
Fatigue | 7 | 6 | 10 | 0 |
Abdominal pain | 4 | 9 | 4 | 15 |
AEs of any grade or cause, % | ||||
Leading to dosing modification | 58 | 22 | 54 | 24 |
Leading to treatment discontinuation | 13 | 17 | 9 | 11 |
aOccurring in ≥10% of pts in any group. bIncludes decreased neutrophil count. cIncludes decreased hemoglobin level. 1. Shitara K, et al. Lancet Oncol 2018.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Josep Tabernero
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jianzheng Wang
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Reema Anil Patel
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: David Bing Zhen