National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
Kohei Shitara , Toshihiko Doi , Hisashi Hosaka , Peter C. Thuss-Patience , Armando Santoro , Paula Jiménez-Fonseca , FEDERICO LONGO , Ozgur Ozyilkan , Irfan Cicin , David Park , Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz Tejani , Aziz Zaanan , Domenico Bilancia , Carles Pericay , Mustafa Ozguroglu , Maria Alsina , Lukas Makris , Sandra McGuigan , David H. Ilson
Background: 60% of newly diagnosed GC pts are > 65 y of age, a proportion that is increasing. The global phase 3 study TAGS (NCT02500043) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in previously treated pts with mGC/mGEJC. Here we report results in the pt subgroup aged ≥65 in TAGS. Methods: Pts with mGC/mGEJC treated with ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized (2:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 BID on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28-day cycle) or placebo, plus best supportive care. A preplanned efficacy/safety analysis was performed in pts aged ≥65 y. Results: Of 507 randomized pts, 228 (45%) were aged ≥65 y (range 65–89). The pt subset aged ≥65 y was similar to the overall population, except for a higher incidence of moderate renal impairment in the elderly subgroup (31% vs 17%). For pts aged ≥65 y, baseline characteristics were generally balanced across the treatment groups, although more pts treated with FTD/TPI than with placebo had ECOG PS 1 (69% vs 59%). FTD/TPI had an efficacy benefit in pts aged ≥65 y, and the FTD/TPI safety profile was similar in this subgroup vs the overall population (table). Treatment-related deaths (one in each treatment group) did not occur in pts aged ≥65 y. No drug-related deaths associated with cardiotoxicity were reported in pts aged ≥65 y. Although dose modifications were used more often in this subgroup, there was no increase in discontinuations vs the overall population. Conclusions: FTD/TPI was safe and effective in pts aged ≥65 y, who had a higher incidence of moderate renal impairment vs the overall population. Clinical trial information: NCT02500043
Overall population1 | Age ≥65 y | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
FTD/TPI | Placebo | FTD/TPI | Placebo | |
ITT population, n | 337 | 170 | 154 | 74 |
Median OS, mo | 5.7 | 3.6 | 6.2 | 5.4 |
HR (95% CI) | 0.69 (0.56–0.85) | 0.73 (0.52–1.02) | ||
Median PFS, mo | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
HR (95% CI) | 0.57 (0.47–0.70) | 0.44 (0.32–0.61) | ||
Safety population, n | 335 | 168 | 153 | 72 |
Grade ≥3 AEs of any cause, % | ||||
Any | 80 | 58 | 80 | 51 |
Most commona | ||||
Neutropeniab | 34 | 0 | 40 | 0 |
Anemiac | 19 | 8 | 18 | 8 |
Actions taken for any-cause/grade AEs, % | ||||
Dose modification | 58 | 22 | 61 | 22 |
Treatment discontinuation | 13 | 17 | 12 | 14 |
aOccurring in ≥10% of pts in any group. bIncludes decreased neutrophil count. cIncludes decreased hemoglobin level. 1. Shitara K, et al. Lancet Oncol 2018.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ilya Tsimafeyeu
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Toru Imai
2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Josep Tabernero
2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kohei Shitara