Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Dejan Juric , Sibylle Loibl , Fabrice Andre , J. Ignacio Delgado Mingorance , Frederic Forget , Christelle Levy , Norikazu Masuda , Mario Campone , Pier Franco Conte , Hiroji Iwata , Ingrid A. Mayer , Hope S. Rugo , Celine Wilke , Antonia Ridolfi , Agnes Lteif , Eva Ciruelos
Background: A contributor to ETR, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway hyperactivation can result from mutations to PIK3CA; ~40% of pts with HR+, HER2– ABC exhibit tumors with this mutation. Use of the oral α-specific PI3K inhibitor ALP + FUL significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with a PIK3CA mutation (HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.85; P<0.001) in SOLAR-1, which included both ET sensitive (ETS) and ETR pts (Table). ETS pts were later excluded by a protocol amendment. ETR was further defined as primary (1R) or secondary (2R) per ESMO criteria in both 1L and 2L pts. This subgroup analysis evaluated pts with a PIK3CA mutation based on tx line and endocrine status. Methods: SOLAR-1 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of ALP 300 mg QD or PBO Q28d + FUL 500 mg Q28d + C1d15 in men and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– ABC whose disease progressed on/after an aromatase inhibitor. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (mPFS) presented by tx arm. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model estimated HR and 2-sided 95% CI. Results: Of 341 pts in the PIK3CA mutant cohort, 39 (11%) were ETS; 302 (89%) were ETR. mPFS in the ALP vs PBO arms was 22.1 vs 19.1 mo (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.35-2.17) for ETS pts and 9.4 vs 4.2 mo (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84) for ETR pts. For ETR pts, mPFS for 1L (n=138) was 9.0 vs 4.7 mo (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46-1.05) and for 2L (n=161) was 10.9 vs 3.7 mo (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89). Conclusions: In SOLAR-1, mPFS was improved with ALP + FUL vs PBO + FUL across ETR pts in 1L and 2L. Representation of ETS pts was low in SOLAR-1, which included more ETR pts. Analysis of the PI3K pathway in ETS pts is warranted in future studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02437318
Tx Line | Endocrine Status | Resistance | Resistance Definition | n |
---|---|---|---|---|
1L | ETS | – | Relapse ≥12 mo after end of adj ET | 39 |
ETR | 1R | Relapse <24 mo on adj ET | 25 | |
2R | 24 mo on adj ET ≤relapse <12 mo after end of adj ET | 113 | ||
2L | ETR | 1R | Progression <6 mo on ET for ABC | 19 |
2R | Progression ≥6 mo on ET for ABC | 132 |
Of 302 ETR pts, 10 pts in 2L could not be assigned to 1R/2R per ESMO criteria; 3 pts could not be assigned to 1L/2L and subsequently to 1R/2R.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Natalija Dedic Plavetic
First Author: Michelino De Laurentiis
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Hiroji Iwata
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Dejan Juric