Results of the first interim assessment of rEECur, an international randomized controlled trial of chemotherapy for the treatment of recurrent and primary refractory Ewing sarcoma.

Authors

null

Martin G. McCabe

University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Martin G. McCabe , Veronica Moroz , Maria Khan , Uta Dirksen , Abigail Evans , Nicola Fenwick , Nathalie Gaspar , Jukka Kanerva , Thomas Kühne , Alessandra Longhi , Roberto Luksch , Cristina Mata , Marianne Phillips , Kirsten Sundby Hall , Claudia Maria Valverde Morales , Andrew J. Westwood , Mark Winstanley , Jeremy Whelan , Keith Wheatley

Organizations

University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany, University College London, London, United Kingdom, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, Oncología Pediatrica Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, EuroEwing Consortium, London, United Kingdom, Starship Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other

Background: 5-year survival of RR-ES is about 15%. Several chemotherapy regimens are used, but without robust evidence. rEECur, the first randomised controlled trial in this setting, is defining a standard of care, balancing efficacy and toxicity. Methods: Patients aged 4 to 50 with RR-ES and fit to receive chemotherapy were randomised 2, 3 or 4 ways between topotecan & cyclophosphamide (TC), irinotecan & temolozomide (IT), gemcitabine & docetaxel (GD) or high-dose ifosfamide (IFOS). Primary outcome measure was objective response (OR) after 4 cycles by RECIST 1.1. Secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and toxicity. A probability-based Bayesian approach was used. The first interim assessment to determine which arm should be closed occurred when 50 evaluable patients had been recruited to 3 arms and evaluated for the primary outcome measure. Results: 242 patients (89% RECIST-evaluable) recruited between 18/12/14 and 21/06/18 were randomised to TC (n=75), IT (71), GD (66) and IFOS (30). Median age was 21 years (range 4 to 49). Patients had: refractory ES (20%), 1st recurrence (63%), >1st recurrence (17%); initial primary disease arose in bone in 60%; disease progression sites were primary site (17%), pleuropulmonary (29%) or other metastatic (54%). Median follow up was 11.3 months. Outcomes in the GD arm were: response rate 11.5% (95% CI: 4.4 to 23%), median PFS 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.6 to 8.0), median OS 13.7 months (95% CI: 10.1 to 23.9). The table shows, for each pairwise comparison of GD with the other arms (randomly labelled A, B, C to maintain blinding of open arms), the probabilities given the observed data that OR, PFS and OS were better for GD than for each other arm (RR: relative risk, HR: hazard ratio). For OR and PFS, all comparisons favoured the other arms. There were fewer grade 3/4 adverse events with GD than with the other arms pooled (58% v. 74%). Conclusions: rEECur has shown that GD is a less effective treatment than TC, IT or IFOS in reducing tumour burden or prolonging PFS in RR-ES. Recruitment continues to the remaining arms. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN36453794.

Posterior probability
Pairwise comparisonOR RR >1PFS HR <1OS HR <1
A vs GD11%31%93%
B vs GD4%8%49%
C vs GD17%30%38%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Sarcoma

Track

Sarcoma

Sub Track

Bone Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ISRCTN36453794

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 11007)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.11007

Abstract #

11007

Abstract Disclosures