Impact of travel time on healthcare costs and resource utilization by phase of care for older cancer patients.

Authors

Gabrielle Rocque

Gabrielle Betty Rocque

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Gabrielle Betty Rocque , Courtney Williams , Harold D. Miller , Andres Azuero , Stephanie B. Wheeler , Maria Pisu , Olivia Margaret Hull , Rodney Paul Rocconi , Kelly Kenzik

Organizations

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, Pittsburg, PA, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL

Research Funding

Other

Background: Closures of hospitals and clinics may have unintended consequences, including increasing patient travel time. Increased patient travel time to healthcare facilities has the potential to adversely impact patient outcomes. Limited data exist on the impact of travel time on healthcare costs and resource utilization. Methods: This retrospective cohort study from 2012-2015 evaluated drive time to cancer care site for Medicare beneficiaries age ≥ 65 in the Southeastern US. The primary outcome was Medicare spending by phase of care (initial, survivorship, end of life [EOL]). Secondary outcomes included resource utilization measured by hospitalization rates, hospitalization sites, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and chemotherapy-related hospitalization rates. Hierarchical linear models with patients clustered within cancer care site and adjusted for pertinent covariates were used to determine the effects of drive time on average monthly phase-specific Medicare spending. Results: Median drive time was 32 minutes (IQR 18-59) for the 23,382 included Medicare beneficiaries, with 24% of patients driving > 1 hour to their cancer care site. During the initial phase of care, Medicare spending was 14% higher for patients traveling > 1 hour than those traveling ≤ 30 minutes.Hospitalizationrates were 4-13% higher for patients traveling > 1 hour vs. ≤ 30 minutes in the initial (61 vs. 54), survivorship (27 vs. 26), and EOL (310 vs. 86) phases of care (all p < .05). The majority of patients traveling > 1 hour were hospitalized at a local hospital rather than at their cancer care site, whereas the converse was true for patients traveling ≤ 30 minutes. Conclusions: As healthcare locations close, patients living farther from treatment sites may experience more limited access to care, and healthcare spending could increase for Medicare.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Access to Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 6560)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.6560

Abstract #

6560

Poster Bd #

251

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Hospitalization burden and end-of-life (EOL) care in elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

First Author: Laura Donovan

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Hospital use at the end-of-life among elderly Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with poor prognosis cancers.

First Author: Youngmin Kwon

First Author: Courtney Williams

First Author: Courtney Williams