Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Marc Oliva Bernal , Shao Hui Huang , Rachel Taylor , Jie Su , Wei Xu , Aaron Richard Hansen , Raymond Woo-Jun Jang , Andrew Bayley , Ali Hosni , Meredith Elana Giuliani , Jolie Ringash , Scott Victor Bratman , John Cho , Jonathan Crawford Irish , John Waldron , Ilan Weinreb , John Kim , Brian O'Sullivan , Lillian L. Siu , Anna Spreafico
Background: Total cumulative cisplatin dose (CDDP-D) (concurrent/induction/adjuvant) in multimodality therapy for LA-NPC has been associated with survival at centers in Asia. We evaluated the survival impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (adj chemo) and total CDDP-D in a large, single institution Canadian cohort of LA-NPC. Methods: Patients (Pts) withWHO type II and III LA-NPC treated with concurrent IMRT with high-dose CDDP and adj chemo with CDDP/Carboplatin and 5-FU (maximum total/adjuvant CDDP-D= 540/240 mg/m2) between 2003-2016 were analyzed. EBER status was tested by ISH. Staging was classified by UICC/AJCC7thedition TNM. Kaplan-Meier 5-year (5y) for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated and compared by log-rank test betweenstage, adj chemo (yes vs no) and total CDDP-D (>300 vs ≤300mg/m2). Multivariable analysis (MVA) identified survival predictors. Results: A total of 312 pts were evaluated: median age = 49.8 (range 17.4-75.9); EBER+/-/unknown=67%/1%/32%; stage II/III/IV=2%/51%/47%; T4=36%; N3=17%; adj chemo=83% (21% switched to carboplatin); median total/adjuvant CDDP-D=380/160 mg/m2; median follow-up 7.6 years (range 0.6-14.9). 5y OS differed by stage II-III vs IV (95% vs 80%, p<0.001) and total CDDP-D >300 vs ≤300mg/m2 (89% vs 83%, p=0.02). Adj chemo and total CDDP-D impacted 5y OS in stage IV (table). 5y RFS was higher in stage IV with total CDDP-D >300 vs ≤300mg/m2 (74% vs 59%, p=0.03), with a trend in locoregional control (LRC) (91% vs 80%, p=0.05) but not significant on distant control (DC) (78% vs 72%, p=0.36). Conclusions: Total CDDP-D >300 mg/m2 impacts OS in the overall cohort. The benefit of adj chemo and total CDDP-D on OS and RFS is significant in stage IV but not stage II-III LA-NPC, mainly due to higher LRC rather than DC.
Stage | Variables | ||
---|---|---|---|
Adj chemo Yes vs No | Total CDDP-D (mg/m2) >300 vs ≤300 | ||
5yOS % (95%CI) | II-III | 95% (90-99) vs 94% (86-100), p=0.52 | 94% (89-99) vs 96% (90-100), p=0.87 |
IV | 82% (76-89) vs 61% (40-91), p<0.01 | 85% (56-84) vs 69% (78-93), p<0.01 | |
MVA HR (95%CI) | II-III | 0.71 (0.25-2.02, p=0.52) | 0.92 (0.34-2.47, p=0.87) |
IV | 0.32 (0.14-0.74, p<0.01) | 0.43 (0.23-0.81, p<0.01) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Lin-Quan Tang
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Fang Peng
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Hojung An
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Takahiro Tsushima