A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial assessing the activity and safety of regorafenib (REG) in patients (pts) with nonadipocytic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) previously treated with pazopanib (PAZ).

Authors

null

Nicolas Penel

Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France

Nicolas Penel , Jean-Yves Blay , Jennifer Wallet , Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard , Axel Le Cesne , Thomas Ryckewaert , Antoine Italiano , Sebastien Salas , Corinne Delcambre , Emmanuelle Bompas , Francois Bertucci , Esma Saada-Bouzid , Loic Chaigneau , Christine Chevreau , Julien Thery , Emilie Decoupigny , Marie Vanseymortier , Marie-Cecile Le Deley , Olivier Mir

Organizations

Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France, CEPCM Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France, Department of Medical Oncology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France, IUCT-Oncopôle/Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: After we demonstrated the activity of REG in pts with advanced non-adipocytic STS (MirTLO 2016), we conducted a dedicated study in pts previously treated with PAZ+chemo. Methods: We report here the 5th cohort of a double-blind randomized phase 2 trial (NCT01900743). Pts were treated with regorafenib (160mg/d, 21/28d) or placebo (PB). Pts receiving placebo were offered optional cross-over in case of centrally confirmed disease progression. The primary endpoint was centrally-reviewed RECIST-based progression-free survival (PFS), evaluated on the intent-to-treat dataset. A total of 24 events was required to ensure a 90%-power for HR = 0.33 (median PFS, 3·6 vs 1·2 months), with a 1-sided α = 0·1. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: From 12/2015 to 10/2017, 37 pts were randomized (18 REG vs 19 PB) and included in the final analysis. The median age was 60 (36-76). There were 28 women (76%). All pts had a performance status 0 or 1. Histological subtypes included 24 leiomyosarcoma (11 vs 13, in REG and PB, respectively), 1 synovial sarcoma (REG), 12 other sarcoma (7 vs 5). All pts had previously been treated with PAZ +chemo (including doxorubicin: 19 vs 17; ifosfamide: 11 vs 3; trabectedin: 11 vs 9; and dacarbazine: 7 vs 6), with 2-6 prior lines. The median relative dose intensity of REG was 0·86, range 0·41-1. Out of 19 pts assigned to placebo, 13 switched to REG after progression. There was no reported objective response. We observed a significant benefit of REG compared to PB in terms of PFS (HR = 0·38; 95%CI, 0·19-0·76; p = 0·007; median PFS = 2·1 vs 1·1 months, respectively), and OS despite the cross-over (HR = 0·41; 95%CI, 0·17-0·98; p = 0·04; median OS = 18·6 vs 8·2 months). Before cross-over, the most common clinically significant grade 3 or higher adverse events were diarrhea (4 vs 0), dyspnea (3 vs 1), arterial hypertension (2 vs 0), hand-foot skin reaction (2 vs 0). Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that regorafenib has a clinically meaningful anti-tumor activity in pts with non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma pretreated by both chemotherapy and pazopanib, improving PFS and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT01900743

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Sarcoma

Track

Sarcoma

Sub Track

Soft Tissue Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01900743

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 11021)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.11021

Abstract #

11021

Poster Bd #

344

Abstract Disclosures