Sites of metastasis (mets) and association with clinical outcomes (CO) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts) treated with cabozantinib (cabo).

Authors

null

Dylan J Martini

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Dylan J Martini , Julie M. Shabto , Yuan Liu , Bradley Curtis Carthon , Alexandra Speak , Elise Hitron , Greta Russler , Sarah Caulfield , Kenneth Ogan , Wayne Harris , Viraj A. Master , Omer Kucuk , Mehmet Asim Bilen

Organizations

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Cabo is approved for the treatment for mRCC. We investigated the association of sites of mets and clinical outcomes (CO) in mRCC pts treated with cabo. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 65 mRCC pts treated with cabo at Winship Cancer Institute from 2016 to 2018. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from first dose of cabo to date of death and clinical or radiographic progression, respectively. Objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Sites of mets were obtained from radiology and clinic notes and included bone, lymph node, brain, lung, and liver. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox proportional hazard or logistic regression model. Results: The median age was 63 years and most (68%) were males. The majority of pts (79%) had ccRCC and 48% received at least 2 prior systemic treatments. The distribution of mets were: bone (42%), lymph node (69%), brain (6%), lung (83%), and liver (40%). The UVA and MVA of association between sites of mets and CO are presented in Table. Pts with bone mets had significantly longer OS in UVA and trended towards longer OS and PFS in MVA compared to pts without bone mets. Conclusions: Bone mets may be a prognostic factor for improved CO in mRCC pts treated with cabo. Larger studies are needed to validate the results of this study. UVA and MVA† of bone metastases and CO.

OS
PFS
OR*
HR (CI)p-valueHR (CI)p-valueOR** (CI)p-value
UVA
No vs. Yes
Bone mets
2.62 (1.14-5.99)0.023***1.63 (0.89-2.99)0.1110.65 (0.20-2.12)0.470
MVA
No vs. Yes
Bone mets
2.63 (0.90-7.71)0.0781.35 (0.66-2.72)0.4091.37 (0.29-6.55)0.691
No - Bone Mets (n=38)Median OS: 7.5 monthsMedian PFS: 3.7 monthsResponse Rate: 16%
Yes - Bone Mets
(n=25)
Median OS: 19.9 monthsMedian PFS: 6.2 monthsResponse Rate: 22%

†Multivariable model controlled for gender, race, IMDC risk group, number of distant metastases, age, and ccRCC *Objective response: probability of PR+CR were modeled. **Odds ratio ***statistical significance at alpha < 0.05.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 585)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.585

Abstract #

585

Poster Bd #

F2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Edward Christopher Dee

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Site of metastasis (SoM) and its impact on clinical outcomes in 8 cancer cohorts.

First Author: Rohini George