SelectMDx versus Prostate Health Index in the identification of high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors

null

Gretchen Hoyer

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO

Gretchen Hoyer , E. David Crawford , Paul Arangua , Whitney Stanton , Francisco G. La Rosa , Wendy Poage , M. Scott Lucia , Adrie van Bokhoven , Priya N. Werahera

Organizations

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, Prostate Condition Education Council, Centennial, CO

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: A major clinical challenge is to identify patients at increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) (Gleason scores ≥ 7) before biopsy. Thus, we evaluated the clinical utility of SelectMDx and Prostate Health Index (phi) tests for diagnosis of high-grade PCa as compared with transperineal mapping biopsy (TMB) results, where an average of 80 prostate needle biopsies are taken every 5 mm for a diagnostic accuracy of 98%. Methods: 70 patients were selected who had TMB. They were evaluated with both SelectMDx and phi tests from before or after TMB; all had serum and post-digital rectal examination urine samples collected prior to treatment, stored in our biorepository. phi was evaluated using proPSA, free PSA and total PSA in serum. SelectMDx test measured mRNA levels of the HOXC6 and DLX1 in post-DRE urine. Published data shows that phi <27 and SelectMDx score = 0% correlate with patients free of HG PCa. Test results were compared against TMB histopathology data. Multivariate logistic regression (MLS) analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine diagnostic accuracy. DeLong test was used to determine statistical significance of ROC curves. All analyses were done for diagnosis of any PCa and high-grade PCa. Results: TMB histopathology showed 17/70 patients with no PCa and 22/53 with high-grade PCa. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of each test are shown in the table below. Pairwise ROC comparison showed no statistically significant difference in the area under the curve of diagnosing PCa (0.75 vs 0.65) and high-grade PCa (0.71 vs 0.81) by phi and SelectMDx tests respectively. MLS analyses showed phi was significantly better than SelectMDx for diagnosing PCa (β = 0.054; p=0.005) and SelectMDx was significantly better than phi for diagnosing high-grade PCa (β = 8.45; p=0.0002). Conclusions: With high sensitivity and NPV, SelectMDx test is more useful than phi for screening patients at risk of high-grade PCa prior to biopsy.

TestAny PCa (Gleason scores ≥ 6)
High-grade PCa (Gleason scores ≥ 7)
SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVSensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
phi79%53%84%45%50%85%61%79%
SelectMDx45%77%86%31%82%75%60%90%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 30)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.30

Abstract #

30

Poster Bd #

B18

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Ekamjit Singh Deol

First Author: Yutaka Hashimoto

First Author: Thorgerdur Palsdottir