The effect of the timing of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy or low-dose-rate brachytherapy for definitive prostate cancer treatment.

Authors

null

Jay P. Ciezki

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Jay P. Ciezki , Chandana A. Reddy , Omar Y. Mian , Rahul D. Tendulkar , James Ulchaker , Kenneth Angermeier , Steven Campbell , Andrew J. Stephenson , Mark Stovsky , Eric A. Klein

Organizations

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Dept. of Translational Hematology Oncology Research, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

Other

Background: To assess the effect of the timing of biochemical failure (bF) after definitive radiotherapy with external beam (EBRT) or low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR) on clinical failure (cF) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Methods: From 1996 to 2009, 4478 patients were treated and by 2010, 456 patients were noted to have a bF. They were categorized as early (< 5 years post-therapy) or late (≥ 5 years post-therapy) failures. Factors thought to influence cF and PCSM were scored. Cox regression was used to assess the timing of bF on cF and Fine and Gray regression was used to assess the timing of bF on PCSM. Results: There were 330 (72.4 %) patients categorized as early and 126 (27.6 %) as late failures. The median PSA follow-up post-radiotherapy for the early bF group is 82 months vs. 155 months for the late bF group, and the median PSA follow-up post-bF is 54 months for the early bF group vs. 69 months for the late bF group. The early failures were more likely to be high-risk (p = 0.0080), have a higher Gleason score (p = 0.0008), and use ADT (p = 0.0325). The five-year rate of cF post early bF is 61% vs 43% post late bF (p <0.0001). The five-year rate of PCSM post early bF is 27% vs 9% post late bF (p <0.0001). The multivariable analyses assessing the cF and PCSM are shown in Table. Conclusions: Early bF is associated with higher rates of cF and PCSM. Patients treated with LDR have a lower risk of PCSM.

Multivariable Analyses for cF and PCSM.

FactorP-valueHR (95% confidence interval)FactorP-valueHR (95% confidence interval)
Clinical Failure (cF)Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality (PCSM)
bF Timing (Early vs Late)0.00011.845 (1.350-2.521)bF Timing (Early vs Late)<0.00013.207 (1.933-5.320)
Biopsy Gleason ScoreRT Type (LDR vs EBRT)0.04320.660 (0.441-0.987)
7 vs 60.48511.111 (0.826-1.495)Biopsy Gleason Score
8-10 vs 6<0.00012.033 (1.481-2.79)7 vs 60.93050.983 (0.669- 1.445)
8-10 vs 7<0.00011.828 (1.351-2.475)8-10 vs 60.00072.066 (1.359- 3.139)
8-10 vs 70.00022.101 (1.431- 3.086)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 28)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.28

Abstract #

28

Poster Bd #

B16

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Michael J. Dattoli

Abstract

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Long-term rates of biochemical recurrence after primary external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer.

First Author: Domenique Escobar

Abstract

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Clinical outcomes following biochemical recurrence among patients with Gleason score 9-10 prostate adenocarcinoma.

First Author: Kiri A Sandler

Abstract

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

External beam radiation therapy with or without brachytherapy boost for low PSA, high-grade prostate cancer.

First Author: Benjamin Walker Fischer-Valuck