Prognostic significance of history of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.

Authors

null

Yongjune Lee

Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)

Yongjune Lee , Young Seok Kim , Bumsik Hong , Yong Mee Cho , Jae-Lyun Lee

Organizations

Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)

Research Funding

Other

Background: Efficacy of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for T2-4aN1M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) was proved by randomize controlled trials. Recent retrospective studies suggested that MIBC patients who had a history of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) had lower pathologic complete response and worse overall survival rate to NAC and RC. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between MIBC that progressed from NMIBC (secondary MIBC) and primary MIBC. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with urothelial carcinoma (cT2-4aN0-1M0) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2011 and December 2017 in Asan Medical Center was conducted. Clinicopathologic outcomes were compared between 187 patients with primary MIBC and 38 patients with secondary MIBC. Results: Baseline characteristics are well balanced between the groups. Downstaging rate ( < ypT2 and no N upstaging) are 46.7% for secondary MIBC group, 55.6% for primary MIBC group (p = 0.390), and positive pathologic metastatic nodes (ypN1+) are observed in 23.3% for secondary MIBC group, 18.3% for primary MIBC group (p = 0.523). There were no differences in overall survival (OS) (3 year OS 69.3% for secondary MIBC, 70.3% for primary MIBC, p = 0.420), disease-free survival (DFS) (3 year DFS 57.7% vs 56.6%, p = 0.880) between the groups. History of NMIBC is not independent prognostic factor for OS on multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Patients with secondary MIBC treated with NAC showed no differences in NAC response, pathologic downstaging rate, OS, DFS compared to patients with primary MIBC. Prospective or larger cohort study are required in the future. Genomic analysis is ongoing to identify genetic differences between two groups.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, Testicular, and Adrenal Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, Testicular, and Adrenal Cancers

Sub Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 375)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.375

Abstract #

375

Poster Bd #

F10

Abstract Disclosures