Analysis of overall survival (OS) based on early tumor shrinkage in the phase III METEOR study of cabozantinib (cabo) versus everolimus (eve) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Authors

null

Ignacio Duran

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain

Ignacio Duran , Pablo Maroto , Cristina Suárez , Daniel E. Castellano , Xavier Garcia del Muro , Luis Costa , Lidia Martin-Couce , Fawzi Benzaghou , Stephane Thomas , David W. Markby , Toni K. Choueiri

Organizations

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain, 3.Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, I + 12 Research Institute, Madrid, Spain, Medical Oncology Department, Institut Catalá d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, Ipsen Pharma, Barcelona, Spain, Ipsen Innovation, Les Ulis, France, Exelixis, Inc., Alameda, CA, Department of Medical Oncology, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: In the phase 3 METEOR study (NCT01865747), cabo improved OS (median 21.4 vs 16.5 mo; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.83), progression-free survival and objective response rate compared with eve in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced RCC (Choueiri 2016). Retrospective studies have shown that early tumour shrinkage (eTS), based on target lesion reduction from baseline to first post-baseline scan, has predictive value for targeted therapies in RCC (Grunwald 2015; Grunwald 2016); here we evaluate its impact on OS in METEOR. Methods: In total, 658 pts were randomized 1:1 to receive cabo (60 mg qd) or eve (10 mg qd), stratified by MSKCC risk group and number of prior VEGFR TKIs. Target lesion size was assessed by independent radiology review using CT/MRI scans at baseline, every 8 wk for the first 12 mo and every 12 wk thereafter. Median OS was estimated for pts with ≥30% eTS, any eTS or no eTS at first post-baseline scan (week 8); data cutoff, 2 October 2016 (Motzer 2018). Results: Median follow-up was 28 mo (IQR 25, 30). Median (range) time to objective response was 1.91 (1.6, 11.0) mo with cabo and 2.14 (1.9, 9.2) mo with eve, and corresponded to the time to the first post-baseline scan. A greater proportion of pts had ≥30% eTS with cabo (20%) than with eve (5%) and the rate of any eTS was higher in the cabo arm (73%) than with eve (47%; Table). Median OS with cabo vs eve for pts with ≥30% eTS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 23.7–NR) vs 10.2 mo (95% CI, 3.9–NE), respectively (stratified HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21–0.95; p<0.05). Median OS with cabo vs eve for pts with any eTS was 23.7 (95% CI, 21.7–27.7) vs 17.3 mo (95% CI, 15.4–20.8), respectively; (stratified HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48–0.80; p<0.05). OS was similar for cabo and eve for pts with no eTS. Conclusions: Cabo demonstrated a higher rate and greater magnitude of eTS at first post-baseline scan compared with eve, and eTS was associated with prolonged OS in pts treated with cabo. Clinical trial information: NCT01865747

Proportion of pts in each subgroup.

Early tumor shrinkageaCabo, n (%)
(N=330)
Eve, n (%)
(N=328)
≥30%65 (19.7)16 (4.9)
Any242 (73.3)155 (47.3)
None77 (23.3)156 (47.6)
Unknown11 (3.3)17 (5.2)

aFrom baseline to first post-baseline scan (week 8)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Rapid Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Rapid Abstract Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01865747

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 550)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.550

Abstract #

550

Abstract Disclosures