Background: The use of AT in elderly patients (pts) with CC-II is controversial. We used Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) linkage with Medicare claims to explore the patterns of AT and survival in pts with CC-II diagnosed between 2004-2010. Methods: Colon cancer was identified using ICD-O-3 codes. TNM staging information was used to classify pts as stage II and its subgroups. We restricted our cohort to pts who had surgery within 4 months (mos) of the diagnosis using ICD-9 codes: 45.7x and 45.8x and excluded pts who died within 3 mos after the surgery as well as those who were enrolled on a health maintenance organization. We searched Medpar, outpatient facility, or carrier claims in the 4 mos after surgery to identify pts who received AT using ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes, HCPCS, and revenue center codes. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between demographics and clinical characteristics of pts in each group and receipt of AT. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. We performed a flexible parametric survival analysis to estimate the 3-year overall survival benefit for AT while controlling for demographics and clinical characteristics. Results: A total of 15,310 pts were included in our study. Among those, 14% (n=2,168ss received AT of which 718 (33%) received oxaliplatin containing regimen. Pts and tumor characteristics are reported in the table. After adjusting for pts and tumor characteristics, probability of survival at 3 years was 72.9% for pts who received AT and 74.2% for those who did not, HR=1.06 (95% CI, 0.96-1.17), with P-value: 0.229. The AT use was declining over time. Conclusions: Although AT is used in healthier and higher risk elderly pts with colon cancer, it was not associated with significantly improved overall survival.