Subsequent anticancer medication following first-line lenvatinib: A posthoc responder analysis from the phase 3 REFLECT study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors

null

Angel Alsina

Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL

Angel Alsina , Masatoshi Kudo , Arndt Vogel , Ann-Lii Cheng , Won Young Tak , Baek-Yeol Ryoo , T.R. Jeffry Evans , Carlos López-López , Bruno Daniele , Soamnauth Misir , Min Ren , Namiki Izumi , Shukui Qin , Richard S. Finn

Organizations

Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain, Ospedale del Mare, Napoli, Italy, Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) was shown to be noninferior to sorafenib (SOR) for overall survival (OS) in REFLECT (median OS [mOS], 13.6 vs 12.3 months [mo]; HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79–1.06). LEN was superior vs SOR for secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR) per mRECIST: 24.1% vs 9.2% by investigator and 40.6% vs 12.4% by independent review (Kudo M et al. Lancet 2018). We report a posthoc responder analysis of patients (pts) who received first-line LEN in REFLECT and subsequent anticancer medication during survival follow up. Methods: In REFLECT, pts with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were randomized 1:1 to receive first-line LEN or SOR. Objective response was defined as complete or partial response by mRECIST per investigator. Pts with disease progression and who discontinued treatment were followed for survival every 12 weeks; subsequent anticancer medication during survival follow up were recorded until time of death. Data cutoff: Nov 13, 2016. mOS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates with 2-sided 95% CIs. Results: In REFLECT, one third of the overall study population (156/478 pts randomized to LEN and 184/476 to SOR) received subsequent anticancer medication, most commonly SOR (25% in LEN arm). ECOG performance status and laboratory assessments, including liver function tests, were comparable between arms prior to subsequent treatments. Among these pts, mOS was 21 vs 17 mo and ORR was 27.6% vs 8.7% for LEN vs SOR arms, respectively. In a subset analysis of LEN responders who received any subsequent anticancer medication (n = 43), mOS was 26 mo (95% CI 18.5–34.6). For SOR responders who received any subsequent anticancer medication (n = 16), mOS was 22 mo (95% CI, 14.6–NE). For LEN responders who subsequently received SOR (n = 35), mOS was 26 mo (95% CI 18.2–34.6). Conclusions: In REFLECT, one third of pts randomized to first-line LEN received subsequent anticancer medication, including SOR, with a mOS of 21 mo. In this exploratory, posthoc analysis of pts who responded to LEN and received any subsequent anticancer medication or SOR, mOS was 26 mo. Clinical trial information: NCT01761266

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01761266

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 4; abstr 371)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.371

Abstract #

371

Poster Bd #

K11

Abstract Disclosures