A retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors

null

Hiroshi Nakatsumi

Department of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan

Hiroshi Nakatsumi , Yoshito Komatsu , Shintaro Nakano , Kentaro Sawada , Tetsuhito Muranaka , Yasuyuki Kawamoto , Satoshi Yuki , Yusuke Uchinami , Hiroshi Taguchi , Hiroki Shirato , Yuma Ebihara , Toshiaki Shichinohe , Satoshi Hirano , Naoya Sakamoto

Organizations

Department of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan, Department of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Hokkaido, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

Research Funding

Other

Background: The standard treatment of resectable esophageal cancer in Japan is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery, while definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered as an alternative treatment. There are no randomized clinical trials comparing NAC and CRT in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of NAC or CRT in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients (pts) with clinical stage IB/II/III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received NAC (n = 26) or CRT (n = 17) in Hokkaido University Hospital from January 2009 to December 2014. To compare NAC with CRT, Fisher’s exact test or Mann-Whitney U test was used in terms of pts’ characteristics, and Log-rank test was used in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Pts’ characteristics were as follows; Gender (male/female): 24/2 in NAC and 16/1 in CRT, median age (range): 65y (55-78) in NAC and 72y (57-80) in CRT, primary lesion (Ut/Mt/Lt): 4/12/10 in NAC and 2/9/6 in CRT, clinical stage IB-II/III: 11/15 in NAC and 9/8 in CRT. Four pts (15.4%) in NAC and seven pts (41.2%) in CRT had multiple primary cancer. All pts in NAC and 15 pts in CRT received 5-FU+cisplatin (CDDP), and two pts in CRT received 5-FU+nedaplatin. RT dose in CRT was 50.4Gy in 11 pts, 59.4Gy in five pts and 60Gy in one patient. Four out of 10 pts in NAC with local recurrence received salvage CRT, and three out of 10 pts in CRT with local recurrence received salvage surgery. Median PFS was 21.6 months in NAC and 8.7 months in CRT (HR 1.282, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.871-1.887, p = 0.203), and median OS was 50.4 months in NAC and 48.6 months in CRT (HR 1.151, 95% CI 0.752-1.761, p = 0.516). 5-year OS rate was 49.7% in NAC and 48.3% in CRT. Conclusions: Definitive CRT showed comparable outcome to NAC followed by surgery in pts with resectable thoracic ESCC. Efficacy of NAC or CRT were not sufficient compared to clinical trials. Improvement in efficacy by development of optimal multimodality therapy was warranted.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 4; abstr 115)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.115

Abstract #

115

Poster Bd #

K7

Abstract Disclosures