National trends in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) use for rectal cancer.

Authors

null

Zachary D. Horne

Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

Zachary D. Horne , Stephen Abel , Shaakir Hasan , Alexander V. Kirichenko , Rodney E Wegner

Organizations

Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation represents the current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer prior to surgical resection. Traditionally, 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) was used in this setting. With advancing technology, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was developed with the goal of delivering a more conformal radiation dose, with the potential for reduced toxicity providing a potential advantage across many disease sites. We sought to use the national cancer database (NCDB) to examine trends and predictors for IMRT use in rectal cancer. Methods: We queried the NCDB from 2004-2015 for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation to a standard doses (50.4-54Gy) followed by surgical resection. Odds ratios were used to determine predictors of IMRT use. Univariable and multivariable cox regressions were used to determine potential predictors of overall survival (OS). Propensity matching was used to account for any indication bias. Results: We identified 21,490 patients satisfying eligibility criteria, of which 3,131 were treated with IMRT. IMRT use increased from 1% in 2004 to 22% in 2014. Predictors for IMRT use included increased N stage, more recent treatment year, treatment at an academic facility, increased income, and higher educational level. On multivariable analysis including propensity score male gender, increased distance to facility, higher comorbidity score, IMRT technique, government insurance, African American race, and non-metro location were predictive of worse OS. Of note, the complete response rate at time of surgery was 28% with non-IMRT and 21% with IMRT. Conclusions: IMRT use has steadily increased in the treatment of rectal cancer, but still remains only a fraction of overall treatment technique. IMRT use correlated with worse survival likely due to utilization in higher stages and patients with worse disease features.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 4; abstr 648)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.648

Abstract #

648

Poster Bd #

L13

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts