Sidedness in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: Which are the factors which influence the prognosis?

Authors

null

Maria Kogay

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

Maria Kogay , Ludovic Evesque , Antoine Falcoz , Angelique Saint , Gerard Cavaglione , Renaud Schiappa , Guillaume Baudin , Gerard A. Milano , Emmanuel Chamorey , Eric Francois

Organizations

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France, Biostatistics’ Unite, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Cote d’Azur, Nice, France, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France

Research Funding

Other

Background: Recent reports demonstrate prognostic and predictive impacts of the location of the primary tumor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Our retrospective analysis aimed to determine the influence of primary site on metastatic distribution and disease evolution. Methods: From our database all patients (pts) with mCRC (except transverse carcinoma) treated from 1/12/2007 to 1/12/2016 in our institution were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 284 pts with available data were analyzed: 83 with Right-sided Colon Cancer (RCC) (29%), 123 with Left-sided Colon Cancer (LCC) (43%) and 78pts with Rectal Cancer (RC) (28%). Hepatic, lung, lymph nodes and peritoneal metastases were respectively found in 63%, 36%, 23% and 20% of the population. The incidence or number of liver metastases were not influenced by sidedness (p = 0.06), LCC presented more bilobar involvement compared to RCC and RC (p = 0.017). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was significantly correlated to colon cancer (p = 0.002), whereas lung metastases were more common in RC (p < 0.001). Patients with RCC more often presented distal lymph node involvement (p = 0.008). RAS mutation status was known for 241pts (80%), of those 110 (37%) were RAS mutated with no significant differences between RCC, LCC and RC (p = 0.4), BRAF mutation (p = 0.007) was more common in RCC. On a multivariable analysis, primary tumor resection (PTR) and complete response after first line therapy were associated with a better OS but only a trend was observed for LCC and RC. Lung, lymph and peritoneal metastasis were associated with worse OS (Table). Conclusions: These results suggests that mCRC had different clinical presentation at diagnosis, the association with molecular features may explain the independent prognostic factor for OS of the sidedness.

Prognostic factors: multivariate analysis

Hazard ratio [IC95% OR]
LCC0.661 [0,434 - 1,007]
RC0.788 [0,581 - 1,292]
PTR0.312 [0,211 - 0,461]
Lung metastases1.822 [1,236 - 2,686]
Lymph node metastases1.519 [1,02 - 2,261]
Peritoneal carcinomatosis2.344 [1,511 - 3,637]
Complete response after first line therapy0.278 [0,175 - 0,443]

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Screening

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 4; abstr 497)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.497

Abstract #

497

Poster Bd #

C18

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Timing of primary tumor resection after systemic chemotherapy initiation among patients with metastatic colon cancer.

First Author: Munir Buhaya

First Author: Bozena Cybulska-Stopa

First Author: JEONGSEOK JEON