Temporal trends and disease characteristics associated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) usage.

Authors

null

Laila Babar

The Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA

Laila Babar , Veli Bakalov , Stephen Abel , Gene Grant Finley , Moses S. Raj , Dulabh K. Monga , Alexander V. Kirichenko , Rodney E Wegner

Organizations

The Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, AHN, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Bradenton, FL, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Medical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by resection and postoperative multi-agent chemotherapy (maChT) is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Using this approach, maChT administration is delayed several months, leading to concern for high rates of distant failure. To reduce the rate of systemic failure, a novel treatment approach known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been increasingly employed, in which patients receive both maChT and nCRT prior to resection. We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine temporal trends in TNT usage, as well, as any potential effect on survival. Methods: We queried the NCDB for patients diagnosed with LARC (Stage II-III) from 2004–2015 treated with nCRT or TNT. TNT was defined as maChT initiated ≥ 90 days prior to the start of nCRT. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of last contact or death using Kaplan Meier curves to present the cumulative probability of survival, with log-rank statistics used to assess statistical significance between groups. Multivariable cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival and propensity score analysis was used to account for indication bias. Results: We identified 9,066 eligible patients, with 8,812 and 254 patients receiving nCRT and TNT, respectively. Nodal involvement and Stage III disease were predictive of TNT use, as well as, treatment in in more recent year. TNT and nCRT had similar 5-year survival, 76% and 78%, respectively. MVA identified age > 58, increased income, urban location, academic treatment facility, and lower co-morbidity score as predictors of worse OS. Multivariable analysis with propensity score demonstrated increased age, higher comorbidity score, higher grade, African American race, and gender as predictive of worse OS. Conclusions: Our data demonstrates a trend toward increasing TNT use, particularly in patients with greater nodal involvement or clinical stage. Despite worse disease characteristics, patients treated with TNT had similar survival to those receiving standard nCRT. Randomized trials are underway to further define the clinical benefit of TNT.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 4; abstr 642)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.642

Abstract #

642

Poster Bd #

L7

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Paul Bernard Romesser

First Author: Floris S Verheij

First Author: Meng Wang