Meta-analysis of OS for pancreatic cancer patients receiving 5FU and oxaliplatin-based therapy after failing first-line gemcitabine-containing therapy.

Authors

null

Zev A. Wainberg

University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

Zev A. Wainberg , Kynan Feeney , Myung Ah Lee , Andres J. Muñoz Martín , Antonio Cubillo Gracián , Sara Lonardi , Baek-Yeol Ryoo , Annie Hung , Yong Lin , Johanna C. Bendell , J. Randolph Hecht

Organizations

University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, St. John of God Hospital, Murdoch, Australia, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, HM Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain, Istituto Oncologico Veneto - IRCCS, Padova, Italy, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Armo BioSciences, Redwood City, CA, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Pancreatic cancer is the 3rd most common cause of cancer-related death in US. After progression on first-line gemcitabine-based therapy, guidelines suggest that 5FU with nanoliposomal irinotecan/irinotecan is the preferred regimen. Oxaliplatin (OXA) is not endorsed as prominently, as conflicting results have emerged on the efficacy of 5FU/OXA. This large variability in efficacy outcomes may be due to the heterogeneity of patient performance status (PS) or other confounding factors. We performed a meta analysis in an attempt to estimate the median (m) OS of patients receiving 5FU/OXA-containing regiments after failing first-line treatment with gemcitabine-containing therapy. Methods: A systematic review of literature and existing meta analyses for second-line treatment of pancreatic cancer was performed. Selection inclusion criteria included: prior gemcitabine treatment, second-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, 5FU and OXA; exclusion criteria included: oral 5FU (S1), irinotecan, capecitabine/cisplatin, no ECOG disclosure. A Bayesian fixed effect meta analysis was performed for the mOS with PS as predictor. A non-informative prior was used to establish the relationship between mOS and PS. The posterior median of OS and 95% predictive interval (PI) were summarized. Results: Eleven studies (454 patients) met the selection criteria for analysis. Median OS for patients receiving second-line 5FU and OXA-based therapy with ECOG PS 0-1 was 6.2 months (95% PI 5.4, 7.1). Restricting to FOLFOX (6 studies, 258 patients), mOS was 6.3 months (95% PI, 5.4, 7.4). Median OS were comparable to those observed with nanoliposomal irinotecan (NAPOLI-1) where 90% patients had ECOG 0-1. Some of the most frequent ( > 10%) grade 3-4 AEs for 5FU and OXA included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and fatigue, comparable to that reported with irinotecan-based therapy. Conclusions: This meta analysis suggests that after progression on a first-line gemcitabine containing regimen, 5FU and OXA-based therapy (eg. FOLFOX) may be a viable and acceptable treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer with good PS.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Screening

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 4; abstr 202)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.202

Abstract #

202

Poster Bd #

A18

Abstract Disclosures