University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
Zev A. Wainberg , Kynan Feeney , Myung Ah Lee , Andres J. Muñoz Martín , Antonio Cubillo Gracián , Sara Lonardi , Baek-Yeol Ryoo , Annie Hung , Yong Lin , Johanna C. Bendell , J. Randolph Hecht
Background: Pancreatic cancer is the 3rd most common cause of cancer-related death in US. After progression on first-line gemcitabine-based therapy, guidelines suggest that 5FU with nanoliposomal irinotecan/irinotecan is the preferred regimen. Oxaliplatin (OXA) is not endorsed as prominently, as conflicting results have emerged on the efficacy of 5FU/OXA. This large variability in efficacy outcomes may be due to the heterogeneity of patient performance status (PS) or other confounding factors. We performed a meta analysis in an attempt to estimate the median (m) OS of patients receiving 5FU/OXA-containing regiments after failing first-line treatment with gemcitabine-containing therapy. Methods: A systematic review of literature and existing meta analyses for second-line treatment of pancreatic cancer was performed. Selection inclusion criteria included: prior gemcitabine treatment, second-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, 5FU and OXA; exclusion criteria included: oral 5FU (S1), irinotecan, capecitabine/cisplatin, no ECOG disclosure. A Bayesian fixed effect meta analysis was performed for the mOS with PS as predictor. A non-informative prior was used to establish the relationship between mOS and PS. The posterior median of OS and 95% predictive interval (PI) were summarized. Results: Eleven studies (454 patients) met the selection criteria for analysis. Median OS for patients receiving second-line 5FU and OXA-based therapy with ECOG PS 0-1 was 6.2 months (95% PI 5.4, 7.1). Restricting to FOLFOX (6 studies, 258 patients), mOS was 6.3 months (95% PI, 5.4, 7.4). Median OS were comparable to those observed with nanoliposomal irinotecan (NAPOLI-1) where 90% patients had ECOG 0-1. Some of the most frequent ( > 10%) grade 3-4 AEs for 5FU and OXA included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and fatigue, comparable to that reported with irinotecan-based therapy. Conclusions: This meta analysis suggests that after progression on a first-line gemcitabine containing regimen, 5FU and OXA-based therapy (eg. FOLFOX) may be a viable and acceptable treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer with good PS.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kunihiro Fushiki
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Linde Kehmann
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Seung Tae Kim
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Shintaro Nakano