Feasibility of SM-88 in PC after multiple prior lines and ECOG < 2.

Authors

null

Marcus Smith Noel

University of Rochester James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY

Marcus Smith Noel , Andrea Wang-Gillam , Allyson J. Ocean , Giuseppe Del Priore , Vincent J. Picozzi

Organizations

University of Rochester James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, Tyme Technology, Inc., New York, NY, Virginia Mason Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Advanced PC patients with ≥ 3Ls of chemo or ECOG PS 2 are generally excluded from clinical trials. SM88 demonstrated no drug related AEs > grade 2 in an interim prostate phase 2 (JCO 2018 36:6S P 175). We sought to determine the feasibility of a trial in this vulnerable population using SM88. Methods: Prospective randomized phase 2 of SM-88 (tyrosine derivative, CYP3a4 inducer, mTOR and oxidative stress catalyst) in patients with locally PD or mPC, ECOG PS < 2 and ≥ 2 weeks from prior therapy. Results: Mean age = 64.9 (range 45.6-84.1); 45.5% female, 93.1% white, 6.9% other; median prior lines = 3 (range 1-6); 12% had prior RT and 17% surgery. Median ECOG PS was 1 with 36.6% 0, 63.3% 1 and 0% ECOG PS 2. From April 2018 to this abstract deadline, 72 patients at 24 sites have consented; 36 patients initiated therapy, 19 failed screening and 17 remained in screening. Time from opening trial to first patient consented = 5.1 wks; median time last regimen to consent = 6.7 wks; from consent to drug administration (C1D1) = 1.7 wks. Subjects traveled up to 2600 miles to enroll at a site with an open slot. Median number of subjects/site = 3 (1-15). Median time on trial is 52 days (1-22 wks). There were 15 unrelated SAEs among 36 randomized subjects; three subjects died after consenting but before receiving study drug (table). Grade 4 and 5 SAEs∗ were more common before receiving drug or unrelated to drug (26/94) than at least possibly drug related (0/17) (Fisher p < 0.05). Efficacy using RECIST, PERCIST and BICR along with CTCs, 19.9, NLR, PROs and other outcomes are being collected with high compliance. Conclusions: This prospective SM88 trial suggests that heavily pretreated PC patients with criteria that includes less than ideal ECOG can participate and gain access to novel therapies. This trial plans to enroll 99 additional subjects in under a year. Although ECOG 2 was allowed none have been consented to date and may reflect investigator bias on enrollment or PS assessment. Investigators can meet the needs of this patient population by considering them for inclusion in future drug development trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03512756

AEs on Trial (Unconfirmed)

GradeUnrelated before starting drugUnrelated on drugPossibly RelatedProbably RelatedRelated
1118400
2121550
3010201
4∗814000
5∗31000
Total13641151

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03512756

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 4; abstr 310)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.310

Abstract #

310

Poster Bd #

G8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts