Risk of gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities in patients with cancer treated with poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors: A meta-analysis of seven phase III trials.

Authors

null

Myo Zaw

Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY

Myo Zaw, Anita Sultan, Sriman Swarup, Myat M. Han, Yin Mon Myat, Khaing Khaing Htwe, Aung Myo Hein, Tsujung Yang, Kyaw Zin Thein

Organizations

Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, NY, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Inhibition of poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) enzymes terminates an alternative DNA repair pathway, resulting in synthetic lethality in homologous recombination deficient tumors. Many PARP inhibitors have shown to improve survival in many solid tumors with noteworthy safety concerns. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to determine the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatic toxicities. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 2018. Phase III RCTs that mention GI toxicities and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as adverse effects were incorporated in the analysis. Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Random effects model was applied. Results: 3188 patients from 7 phase III RCTs with breast, ovarian and gastric cancer were eligible. Studies compared olaparib or niraparib or rucaparib versus placebo, olaparib versus single agent chemotherapy, iniparib + gemcitabine / carboplatin (GC) versus GC, veliparib + C versus C and olaparib + paclitaxel versus paclitaxel. The RR of all-grade side effects were as follows: diarrhea, 1.24 (95% CI: 1.08 – 1.42, P = 0.002); nausea, 1.53 (95% CI: 1.16 – 2.02, P = 0.002); vomiting, 1.46 (95% CI: 1.02 – 2.08, P = 0.03); elevated AST, 1.25 (95% CI: 0.58 – 2.67, P = 0.55); and elevated ALT, 1.61 (95% CI: 0.81 – 3.20, P = 0.16). The RR of high-grade side effects were as follows: diarrhea, 1.08 (95% CI: 0.52 – 2.24, P = 0.82); nausea, 1.81 (95% CI: 0.79 – 4.12, P = 0.15); vomiting, 1.99 (95% CI: 1.06 – 3.73, P = 0.03); elevated AST, 1.86 (95% CI: 0.45 – 7.55, P = 0.38); and elevated ALT, 1.33 (95% CI: 0.42 – 4.18, P = 0.62). Conclusions: Our study showed that the risk of developing all grades of vomiting as well as any-grade nausea and diarrhea was high in PARP inhibitors arm, compared to control group. Timely recognition and prompt intervention with good supportive care are entailed.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Advance Care Planning; Caregiver Support; Coordination and Continuity of Care; End-of-Life Care; Models of Care; Survivorship; and Symptom Biology, Assessment and Management

Track

Advance Care Planning,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship,Coordination and Continuity of Care,Symptom Biology, Assessment, and Management,Models of Care,Caregiver Support

Sub Track

Symptom Biology, Assessment, and Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 34; abstr 219)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.34_suppl.219

Abstract #

219

Poster Bd #

G5

Abstract Disclosures