Real-world comparison of biosimilar filgrastim and reference filgrastim in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors

null

Xiaoxue Chen

HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE

Xiaoxue Chen, John Barron, Abiy Agiro, David Joseph Debono, Michael Jordan Fisch

Organizations

HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, Karmanos Cancer Center, Bloomfield Hills, MI, AIM Specialty Health, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

Other

Background: The approval pathway for biosimilars was established in 2010 to facilitate drug competition and generate cost savings. Biosimilar filgrastim products (filgrastim-sndz or tbo-filgrastim) were the first approved biosimilars in the US. This study examined study outcomes (incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), growth factor related adverse events (AE) and filgrastim treatment cost) between users of biosimilar and reference filgrastim drugs among the commercially-insured US population. Methods: A retrospective observational design was used to analyze administrative claims data on adults with cancer treated with chemotherapy between 09/01/2012 - 4/30/2017. The population was grouped into biosimilar filgrastim users (B) and filgrastim users (F) according to the earliest filgrastim use (index date). FN risk factors were assessed within 6 months prior to the index date. Study outcomes were assessed within 21 days post index date using multivariable regression modelling. Results: Among 1,694 biosimilar users and 10,460 filgrastim users, no meaningful differences in baseline FN risk factors were observed. In adjusted results, no difference in incidence of FN was observed between the two groups (B: 13.3%; F: 11.0%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.17; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.99-1.38; p = 0.06). Rates of AE were similar between the two groups (B: 6.9%; F: 6.4%; OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.84-1.29, p = 0.72). The mean number of filgrastim doses administered was 3.4 in both groups (Relative difference: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.02-0.04; p = 0.53). The mean filgrastim drug costs were similar between the two groups (B: $2,491; F: $2,510, Cost Ratio [CR]: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.91-1.01; p = 0.12). However, the mean filgrastim drug cost was 6.7% less for filgrastim-sndz when compared to reference filgrastim (sndz: $2,342; CR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84-0.99; p = 0.04); but not for tbo ($2,549; CR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.91-1.04; p = 0.40). Conclusions: Biosimilar filgrastim is similar to the reference filgrastim in drug safety and effectiveness. The early adoption and saving impact of biosimilar filgrastim has been modest, which highlights the structural and regulatory challenges to biosimilar uptake.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Big Data Studies; Projects Relating to Equity, Value, and Policy

Track

Projects Relating to Equity, Value and Policy,Big Data Studies

Sub Track

Measuring Value and Costs

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 30; abstr 85)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.30_suppl.85

Abstract #

85

Poster Bd #

J4

Abstract Disclosures