Using standardized electronic pathology data to identify practice variation, potential impact to patient outcomes, and quality improvement initiatives.

Authors

null

Jessica Kitchen

Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada

Jessica Kitchen, Shaalee Sone, Shaheena Mukhi, Mary Argent-Katwala, John Srigley

Organizations

Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Other

Background: Practice variation in diagnosis and treatment exists between clinicians and regions across Canada. This variation can impact the quality of care that patients receive and affect patient outcomes. We aimed to gain a better understanding of the scale and type of variation between clinicians and provinces within the cancer system. Methods: Fifty pathologists, surgeons, and medical oncologists from 10 regions were convened to leverage literature and the College of American Pathologists data standards to create 48 indicators related to five cancers: breast, lung, colorectal, endometrial and prostate. Six months of synoptic pathology data were used to generate the indicators, which were reviewed by 65 clinicians to identify practice variation and potential quality improvement areas. Results: Five provinces generated 48 indicator data analyses. Practice and performance variation across five cancer sites and jurisdictions was found. For example, guidelines recommend examining at least 12 lymph nodes in colorectal cancer resections as this directly impacts staging, treatment and patient prognosis. Only one province met this guideline in 90% of cases. Another example is Lynch syndrome testing, a hereditary condition that increases the risk of developing multiple primary cancers – particularly colorectal and endometrial. The data showed unequitable access to screening with 0-70% of colorectal cancer patients aged ≤70 years and only 10-40% of endometrial cancer cases being screened for Lynch syndrome. The value of these indicators is enormous to inform potential training opportunities and set standards of care at the local or broader clinical governance level so that consistent, high-quality care is delivered in accordance with evidence-based guidelines. Conclusions: Practice variation exists between clinicians and jurisdictions. In two jurisdictions (200 pathologists), comparative pathology indicator data are being used to self-reflect and converse with peers with the goal of reducing practice variation and improving patient care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Big Data Studies; Projects Relating to Equity, Value, and Policy

Track

Projects Relating to Equity, Value and Policy,Big Data Studies

Sub Track

Guideline Concordant Care Initiatives

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 30; abstr 45)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.30_suppl.45

Abstract #

45

Poster Bd #

E10

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Rowan T. Chlebowski

First Author: Fangjian Guo

First Author: Narda Kebaier Ep Chaabouni