Detection of germline homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in patients with metastatic esophagogastric (EG) cancer using clinical next generation sequencing (NGS).

Authors

Yelena Janjigian

Yelena Yuriy Janjigian

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Yelena Yuriy Janjigian , Philip Jonsson , Yelena Kemel , Vijai Joseph , Yaelle Tuvy , Zarina Shameer , Vignesh Ravichandran , Liying Zhang , Diana Mandelker , Geoffrey Yuyat Ku , Jaclyn Frances Hechtman , David Paul Kelsen , David H. Ilson , Kenneth Offit , Michael F. Berger , Nikolaus Schultz , Mark E. Robson , David B. Solit , Barry S. Taylor , Zsofia Kinga Stadler

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Research Funding

Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Background: Although EG cancer is included in Lynch syndrome (LS) and hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), the prevalence of HRD-associated germline mutations in patients with EG cancer remains to be elucidated. To determine the potential therapeutic implications, we assessed the prevalence of clinically actionable germline mutations detected by matched tumor-normal sequencing. Methods: The matched tumor-normal DNA were evaluated for somatic (up to 468 genes) and germline (76 genes) alterations under MSK IRB approved protocols. Prevalence of likely pathogenic and pathogenic germline alterations were reported in genes and correlated with clinical and somatic findings. Results: Of 400 consecutive pts with metastatic EG adenocarcinoma: 53% had esophagus/GEJ and 47% gastric cancer. 48 (12%) of patients had clinically actionable mutations conferring cancer susceptibility, including 38 moderate- to high- penetrance mutations. 30 of 400 pts (7.5%) pts had deleterious somatic (n = 17) or pathogenic germline (n = 19) mutations in the most commonly observed HRD genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2). The prevalence of clinically actionable germline mutations among gastric versus esophagus/GEJ tumors was 15.5% and 8.9%, respectively (p = 0.043). Interestingly, one individual harbored both a BRCA1 and an ATM mutation. Germline DNA mismatch repair mutations, diagnostic of LS, were present in only two pts, both with gastric cancer, MSH2 mutations, with both tumors exhibiting a mismatch repair deficient signature. Other germline mutations of interest include: 6 CDH1, 1 TP53, 1 BRIP1, 1 STK11 pts as well as 1 biallelic MUTYH carrier diagnostic of MUTYH-associated polyposis. When available, correlative tumor data, including somatic mutations and loss of heterozygosity in the gene(s) corresponding to the germline mutation will be presented. Conclusions: Clinical NGS in paired germline-tumor DNA samples increases detection of individuals with potential clinically significant germline/somatic mutations. Analysis of therapeutic implications of these HRD mutations is ongoing and updated data will be presented.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Tumor Biology

Track

Tumor Biology

Sub Track

Tumor-Based Biomarkers

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 12116)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.12116

Abstract #

12116

Poster Bd #

229

Abstract Disclosures

Funded by Conquer Cancer

Similar Abstracts