Efficacy of omega-3 (ω3) supplementation versus omega-6 (ω6) supplementation for reducing pain among breast cancer survivors: A URCC NCORP RCT.

Authors

Luke Peppone

Luke Joseph Peppone

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

Luke Joseph Peppone , Julia Ellen Inglis , Karen Michelle Mustian , Kah Poh Loh , Eva Culakova , Ian Kleckner , Charles Stewart Kamen , Gilbert D. A. Padula , Supriya Gupta Mohile , Po-Ju Lin , Sharon Cole , Michelle Christine Janelsins

Organizations

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, US, Cooper Cancer Center, Akron, OH, Orion Cancer Care, Dayton, OH

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Pain is a highly prevalent side effect of breast cancer therapy. High pain levels can reduce treatment adherence and increase discontinuation rates for hormonal therapies (HT) while reducing quality of life. We conducted a multi-site, blinded phase II RCT examining the efficacy of ω3 fatty acid (fish oil) supplementation versus ω6 fatty acid (soybean oil) supplementation for improving pain through the URCC NCORP. Methods: Breast cancer survivors between 4-36 months post-adjuvant therapy were randomized into 3 arms: 1) High-dose ω3 (ω3; 6 g/day), 2) Low-dose ω3/ω6 (ω3/ω6; ω3: 3 g/day and ω6: 3 g/day) and 3) High-dose ω6 (ω6; 6 g/day) for 6 weeks. Pain was assessed via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at pre- and post-intervention. Serial blood was collected for serum fatty acid and inflammatory biomarker analysis. ANCOVAs, controlling for baseline pain and type of HT (AI, tamoxifen, or none), were used to calculate mean change from baseline to post-intervention for this secondary data analysis. Results: 108 female breast cancer survivors were accrued (93% white, mean age = 60). Biochemical blood analyses confirmed high compliance in all arms with minimal contamination. Mean baseline Worst Pain levels did not differ between groups (ω3 = 4.9, ω3/ω6 = 5.6, ω6 = 4.7; p = 0.43). The mean Worst Pain score decreased by 0.8 points for ω3, by 0.8 points for ω3/ω6, and by 1.7 points for ω6 (ω3 vs ω6 p-value = 0.18). The mean change in Current Pain score was more pronounced (Change score: ω6 = −1.8 vs ω3/ω6 = −0.8 vs ω3 = −0.5; ω3 vs ω6 p = 0.05) and indicated a dose-response. Similar changes were found for Average Pain and Least Pain but the differences were not significant. The ω6 group had a significant reduction in the inflammatory biomarker IL-6 compared to the ω3 group (IL-6 change: ω3 = +0.17 vs ω6 = −0.30; p < 0.01). Conclusions:ω6 supplementation reduced pain levels compared to ω3 supplementation in breast cancer survivors. ω6 also significantly reduced IL-6 levels compared to ω3, indicating a potential mechanism of action. Further research is needed on the effects of ω6 fatty acids in cancer patient. Funding: NCI R03CA175599 & UG1CA189961. Nordic Naturals Inc. supplied all study agents. Clinical trial information: NCT02352779

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02352779

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 10118)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.10118

Abstract #

10118

Poster Bd #

106

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts