Does training oncologists to have goals of care discussions increase and improve the quality of GoC discussions with advanced cancer patients?

Authors

null

Nina A. Bickell

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Nina A. Bickell , Kerin B. Adelson , Jason Parker Gonsky , Jenny J. Lin , Sofya Pintova , Rebeca Franco , Natalia Egorova , Cardinale B. Smith

Organizations

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, Yale University, New Haven, CT, State University of New York Downstate and Kings City Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, NYU, New York, NY, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

Research Funding

Other

Background: Advanced cancer patients often have a poor understanding of the incurability of their cancers and this correlates to higher rates of aggressive treatment near end of life. Goals of Care (GoC) discussions may affect patients’ decisions about aggressive treatment near end of life. We coached oncologists to improve communication skills and assessed its impact on prevalence and quality of GoC discussions. Methods: At an academic, community, municipal and rural hospital, we recruited & randomized solid tumor oncologists & their newly diagnosed advanced cancer patients with < 2 year prognosis. Prior to and after completing 4 coaching sessions, a post-imaging visit was audiotaped and reviewed by VitalTalk trained specialists to assess oncologists’ communication skills. Consented patients were surveyed after their 3 month post-imaging visit & GoC discussions defined as: cancer treatment preferences, what’s important to you in life given your diagnosis and prognosis. Results: We enrolled 22/25 eligible oncologists (88%) & 265 patients. On average, doctors were 44 yrs old (32-66) & in practice 14.5yrs (5-40). There was no significant difference between intervention (INT) and control (CNTL) oncologists’ prior communication skills training (58% v 56%; p = 0.80) & comfort having GoC discussions (58% v 56%; p = 0.80). On average, CNTL physicians had no change in the number of demonstrated skills (5.45 to 5.36/10); INT physicians increased from 6.6 to 8.3/10 skills (p = 0.04). Patients’ mean age was 63 yrs (20-89), 60% male, 52% white, 30% black & 19% Latino. Overall, 61% of patients reported their treatment’s goal was to cure their cancer; 40% reported cure to be likely. 49% had a complete GoC discussion (48% INT v 51%; p = 0.61). 65% of patients reported their oncologist talked about their GoC, “the very best” they could imagine (63% INT v 68% CNTL; p = 0.39). 51% did not report a GoC discussion with no difference between INT (52%) & CNTL (49%) patients (p = 0.61). Conclusions: Using a coaching model to teach oncologists’ communication skills improved skills to carry out a GoC discussion but did not increase rates of GoC discussions among advanced cancer patients with < 2 year life expectancy. Clinical trial information: NCT02374255

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Quality Improvement

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02374255

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 6597)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.6597

Abstract #

6597

Poster Bd #

422

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Nina A. Bickell

First Author: Jamie S. Ostroff

First Author: Brooke Elizabeth Kania