The impact of a positive cognitive impairment screen on conversations between patients, caregivers, and oncologists: A UR NCORP randomized study.

Authors

null

Allison Magnuson

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

Allison Magnuson , Lianlian Lei , Michelle Christine Janelsins , Eva Culakova , Feng Vankee Lin , Maxence Gilles , Arti Hurria , William Dale , Paul Duberstein , Marsha Wittink , Megan Wells , Nikesha Gilmore , Lauren M. Hamel , Mark Allen O'Rourke , Adedayo A. Onitilo , Thomas Paul Bradley , Mary Ingraham Whitehead , Supriya Gupta Mohile

Organizations

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, CIY, Chicago, IL, Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, Center for Integrative Oncology and Survivorship, Greenville, SC, Marshfield Clinic, Weston, WI, Monter Cancer Center, Lake Success, NY, Breast Cancer Options, Sharon, CT

Research Funding

NIH

Background: The prevalence of CI and the utility of CI screening for community oncology practices are not well established. We used two tools to screen for CI in older patients (pts) enrolled onto a cluster randomized controlled trial and explored how CI screening influences conversations about cognition (CAC) between older pts, their caregivers, and oncologists. Methods: Pts aged ≥70 with advanced cancer were recruited (URCC 13070; PI: Mohile). CI screen, including Mini-Cog (MC) (normal/abnormal) and Blessed Orientation Memory Concentration Test (BOMC) (scored 0-28), were included in a Geriatric Assessment (GA). Practices were randomized to usual care (UC) vs GA intervention (GA summary provided to oncologists). Audio-recorded clinical encounters were transcribed by 2 blinded coders who coded CAC with a priori scheme as follows: cognition discussed (Y/N), type of concern, who initiated. MC and BOMC were compared and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses identified BOMC score that best predicted abnormal MC. Results: Mean age was 77 (range 70-93); 2.2% screened positive by BOMC using standard score of ≥11 and 33.5% had abnormal MC. Pts with abnormal MC were more likely to have impaired activities of daily living (ADL) (34 vs 24%), Instrumental ADL (64 vs 52%), Timed Up and Go (47 vs 34%) and positive depression screen (28 vs 19%), (p < 0.05 for all). CAC occurred in 22% of encounters and were more common in the intervention arm (OR 4.64, 95%CI: 2.98- 7.21, p < 0.001). Differences in CACs were most notable for pts with abnormal MC (71% in intervention group vs 16% in UC, p < 0.001). Oncologists were more likely to be the initiator of CACs in the intervention arm (90% vs 57%, p < 0.001). The most common concerns were memory (54%) and comprehension (15%). A BOMC cutoff ≥4 was optimal for predicting abnormal MC (AUC = .73, sensitivity 59%, specificity 74%). Conclusions: In community oncology practices, 1/3 of older pts screen positive for CI and were more likely to have other GA impairments. Providing oncologists with results of a CI screen increases CACs. A lower BOMC cutoff predicted abnormal MC, consistent with studies in non-cancer pts where lower BOMC score predicted more mild CI.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Geriatric Oncology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 10048)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.10048

Abstract #

10048

Poster Bd #

36

Abstract Disclosures