Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: A Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG1113, FUGA-BT).

Authors

null

Makoto Ueno

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan

Makoto Ueno , Chigusa Morizane , Takuji Okusaka , Junki Mizusawa , Hiroshi Katayama , Masafumi Ikeda , Masato Ozaka , Kazuya Sugimori , Akira Fukutomi , Hiroki Hara , Nobumasa Mizuno , Hiroaki Yanagimoto , Keiji Sano , Kazutoshi Tobimatsu , Kei Yane , Shoji Nakamori , Naohiro Sata , Seigo Yukisawa , Hiroshi Ishii , Junji Furuse

Organizations

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, JCOG Data Center/ Operation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, JCOG Data Center/ Operation Office, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan, Divison of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Hirakata, Japan, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, Center for Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Japan, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan, Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan, Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Research Funding

Other

Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, GC is considered to be toxic because of nausea, vomiting, and appetite loss, and inconvenient due to requiring hydration before and after administration. GEM plus S-1 (GS) was reported to be promising with preferable efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile. This phase III study aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC in terms of overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable biliary tract adenocarcinoma (gallbladder, intrahepatic biliary tract, extrahepatic biliary tract, or ampulla of Vater), an ECOG-PS of 0–1, and adequate organ function. In the GC arm, 1 g/m2 of GEM and 25 mg/m2 of cisplatin was infused on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. In the GS arm, 1 g/m2 of GEM was infused on days 1 and 8, and S-1 60, 80, or 100 mg/day according to body-surface area was administered from days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was OS and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), clinically relevant AEs predefined as any of grade 2 or more fatigue, appetite loss, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, and diarrhea. The sample size was calculated to be 350 with a one-sided alpha of 5%, a power of 80%, non-inferiority margin of 1.155 in terms of hazard ratio (HR). Results: From May 2013 to March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. The non-inferiority of GS to GC was demonstrated (median OS: 13.4 months (m) in GC and 15.1 m in GS, HR 0.95; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78 to 1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority). Median PFS was 5.8 m in GC and 6.8 m in GS (HR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.70-1.07). RR was 32.4% in GC and 29.8% in GS. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Clinically relevant AEs were observed 35.1% in GC and 29.9 % in GS. Conclusions: GS demonstrated non-inferiority to GC in OS with good tolerability and was considered as new convenient option of standard of care without hydration for advanced BTC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000010667.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

UMIN000010667

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 4014)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.4014

Abstract #

4014

Poster Bd #

203

Abstract Disclosures