Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor dose on toxicity, response rate, and survival: A pooled analysis of dose escalation phase 1 trials.

Authors

Shiraj Sen

Shiraj Sen

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX

Shiraj Sen , Kenneth R. Hess , David S. Hong , Aung Naing , Le Huang , Funda Meric-Bernstam , Vivek Subbiah

Organizations

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

NIH

Background: PK and PD studies demonstrate drug exposure and target saturation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) at doses below MTD. MTD remains a primary endpoint in ICI phase 1 trials and the optimal dosing to minimize toxicity and optimize response remains unclear. Methods: We analyzed clinical data from pts treated in phase 1 ICI dose escalation trials at MD Anderson Center for Targeted Therapy. Patients were stratified into a low-dose [LDG] ( < 33% MTD), medium dose [MDG] (34-66% MTD), high dose [HDG] (67-100% MTD), or very high dose [VHDG] ( > 100% MTD) group. Groups were compared for irAE, PFS, OS, ORR (CR + PR), and DCR (CR + PR + SD > 6 months). Results: Among 90 pts treated with escalating doses of ICI (57 CTLA4- and 33 PD1-based) between April 2013 and December 2015, median age was 59 years (range: 20-86 years) and 37 (41%) were females. The most common tumor types treated included renal cell carcinoma (n = 23; 25%), melanoma (n = 16; 18%), sarcoma (n = 10; 11%), and GIST (n = 10; 11%). PFS in the LDG (n = 16) was 2.76 months (mo) (95% CI 1.48-NA), MDG (n = 21) was 2.76 mo (95% CI 1.48-NA), HDG (n = 36) was 2.46 mo (95% CI 1.84-3.29), and VHDG (n = 17) was 3.68 mo (95% CI 2.76-NA). Log rank p = 0.22. OS in LDG was 6.18 mo (95% CI 3.45-NA), MDG was 17.05 mo (95% CI 3.94-NA), HDG was 5.16 mo (95% CI 4.24-7.62), and VHDG was 7.49 mo (95% CI 5.59-NA). Log rank p = 0.0070. In all evaluable patients, ORR in LDG, MDG, HDG, and VHDG was 0%, 6%, 6%, and 12% (p = 0.47) and DCR was 62%, 71%, 41%, and 81% (p = .027), respectively. irAE rates in LDG, MDG, HDG, and VHDG were 6%, 10%, 17%, and 29% (p = .045). Conclusions: Despite a dose-dependent increase in irAE, we identify no improvement in PFS, OS, or DCR with escalating doses of ICI administered in phase I trials but do detect an improvement in ORR. Prospective dose-/exposure-response relationships and biomarker-driven RP2D are warranted on all ICI dose-escalation phase 1 trials. Lower doses may reduce toxicity and cost without compromising disease control or survival.

DosingPFS, months (95% CI)OS, months (95% CI)ORR (%)DCR (%)irAE (%)
LDG2.76 (1.48-NA)6.18 (3.45-NR)0626
MDG2.76 (1.84-NA)17.05 (3.94-NR)67110
HDG2.46 (1.84-3.29)5.16 (4.24-7.62)64117
VHDG3.68 (2.76-NA)7.49 (5.59-NR)128129

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Immunotherapy

Track

Developmental Therapeutics and Translational Research

Sub Track

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 3077)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.3077

Abstract #

3077

Poster Bd #

291

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Delayed immune toxicities in patients with breast cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

First Author: Saya Jacob

First Author: Elisa Giommoni