Prospective phase II multicenter trial of ablation after breast lumpectomy added to treat (ABLATE) breast cancer without radiation.

Authors

V. Klimberg

V. Suzanne Klimberg

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR

V. Suzanne Klimberg , Kristalyn Gallagher , Sheldon M. Feldman , Jeanette Y. Lee , Daniela A Ochoa , Joshua Matthew Varghise Mammen , Ronda S. Henry-Tillman , Tom Frazier , Marilee McGinness , Julie Barone , Robert M. Barone , Soheila Korourian

Organizations

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, UNC, Chapel Hill, NC, Columbia Univ Coll of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, Cancer Inst, Little Rock, AR, Bryn Mawr, Bryn Mawr, PA, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, Exempla, Denver, CO, Onc Assoc of San Diego, San Diego, CA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Background:A plethora of studies have failed to define a group of patients that can forgo radiation to complete BCS without a significant increase in recurrence rate. This has resulted in overtreatment with radiation of an estimated 85% of patients with favorable breast cancers. RFA added to standard BCS (eRFA) may not only reduce the need for re-excision for close or focally positive margins but may obviate the need for whole breast irradiation in favorable breast cancer patients. Methods: In an IRB-approved risk-adjusted protocol, 267 T0-2, No breast cancer patients from 7 different sites were screened for a Phase II multicenter protocol of BCS followed by cavitary RFA (eRFA) without adjuvant radiation and followed for margins, recurrence, breast pain, cosmesis and QOL. Results: 242 patients were accrued to the study with a median follow-up of 36 months. Re-excision for positive margins was < 5%. The in breast recurrence rate was 2.5%. In this risk adjusted model XRT was added when SLNB was positive. 20% of cohort received XRT. Breast pain @ 6 months was 19% with RFA+XRT Versus 1.7% with RFA alone(p < 0.05). Cosmesis was good or excellent in > 90% of patients. QOL did not change after eRFA. Conclusions: eRFA may be a new paradigm for treating favorable patients that desire lumpectomy who either cannot or do not want radiation. A majority of the patients avoided re-excision, WBI and/or mastectomy. Treatment in lieu of XRT is safe and effective and may increase definitive treatment compliance for patients as it is complete at the time of surgery. Clinical trial information: 01153035.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Local-Regional Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

01153035

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 562)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.562

Abstract #

562

Poster Bd #

54

Abstract Disclosures