A multi-institution comparison of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) vs. high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (Ara-C Couplets) therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors

null

Sonia Christian

University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

Sonia Christian , Pritesh Rajni Patel , Shawn Griffin , Vaibhav Agrawal , Irum Khan , Karen Sweiss , Ardaman Shergill , Heiko Konig , John G Quigley

Organizations

University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

Research Funding

Other

Background: R/R AML has a poor prognosis, thus salvage chemotherapy is used as a bridge to HSCT, however the optimal regimen remains unknown. MEC is commonly used as salvage; ~ 66% of patients achieve CR, with median survival 36 weeks (Arcese et al., JCO, 1991). As the Ara-Couplets regimen has a similar CR/CRi (55%; Larson et al., Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2012), we compared efficacy and toxicity of these regimens in a multi-institution retrospective analysis. Methods: We analyzed records of 43 patients (15 from UIC, 28 from IU) treated with MEC (mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2, etoposide 80 mg/m2 and cytarabine 1 g/m2 x 5 days) and 36 patients treated with Ara-C Couplets (mitoxantrone 30 mg/m2 daily and cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice daily, days 1 and 5) between 1998 and 2017 (n = 79). Results: Baseline characteristics including gender, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index and age were well balanced. Unfavorable cytogenetics were seen in 14 of MEC and 9 of the Couplets patients (p = ns). CR/CRi was achieved in 21 MEC and 20 Couplets patients (p = 0.65), OS was 196 days vs. 240 days respectively (p = 0.46), and PFS 156 days and 117.5 days respectively (p = 0.86). Seventeen MEC (17/43; 39.5%) and Couplets patients (17/36; 47%) went onto HSCT (p = 0.49). Median ANC recovery was 32 (MEC) and 40 days (Couplets; p = 0.37), while median platelet recovery was significantly different, at 36 and 55 days respectively (p = 0.04). Notably, Grade 3/4 GI toxicity occurred in 8 MEC (18.6%) and only one Couplets patient (2.4%; p = 0.03). In the Couplets group, 2/36 patients experienced cardiac toxicity (5.6%; CHF grades 3/4). The most common adverse event was febrile neutropenia (FN; 95% (MEC) and 86% respectively; p = 0.09). Conclusions: This is the first study directly comparing these salvage regimens in R/R AML; and using a racially diverse population of patients. While both are equally effective as a bridge to HSCT, MEC results in significantly more GI toxicities, and a higher incidence of FN, despite faster platelet recovery. Comparative studies in this population are rare, suggesting the need for larger studies to establish the optimal salvage chemotherapy regimen.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Sub Track

Acute Leukemia

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr e19005)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e19005

Abstract #

e19005

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts