Lenvatinib + pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: Updated results.

Authors

null

Vicky Makker

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Vicky Makker , Drew W. Rasco , Nicholas J. Vogelzang , Mark Messing , Marcia S. Brose , Allen Lee Cohn , Carol Aghajanian , Daniel E. Stepan , Corina E. Dutcus , Emmett V. Schmidt , Matthew Guo , Pallavi Sachdev , Robert Charles Shumaker , Matthew H. Taylor

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics, San Antonio, TX, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, Texas Oncology, Bedford, TX, US, Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, US Oncology, Denver, CO, Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) is an inhibitor of VEGFR 1−3, FGFR 1−4, and other kinases. Pembrolizumab (PEM) is an anti-PD-1 antibody. We report updated interim results from a phase 1b/2 study evaluating LEN + PEM in patients (pts) with advanced endometrial cancer (EC) (NCT02501096). Methods: In this multicenter, open-label study, pts with histologically confirmed EC irrespective of microsatellite instability (MSI) or mismatch repair (MMR) status and measurable disease per immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) received LEN (20 mg PO QD) plus PEM (200 mg IV Q3W). Tumor assessments were performed by investigators using irRECIST. The primary phase 2 endpoint was objective response rate at 24 weeks (ORRWK24), calculated only for evaluable pts who had 24 weeks of follow up or discontinued treatment or died prior to 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included ORR (full analysis set), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR). Results: At data cutoff of Aug 1 2017, 54 pts were enrolled [endometrioid: Gr 1 (7), Gr 2 (12), Gr 3 (5); serous (18); others (8); unknown (4)]. Three (6%) pts were MSI-high (MSI-H); 43 (80%) were non-MSI-H/proficient MMR (MMRp); 8 (15%) were not done/unknown. Median follow-up for PFS was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7–7.6). ORRWK24 was 50.0% (95% CI, 32.4–67.6), and all responses were confirmed. ORR was 36.7% (95% CI, 23.4–51.7), which reflects the short follow-up time for pts with later enrollment. Median DOR has not yet been reached (not estimable [NE], 95% CI, 4.1–NE) and median PFS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 5.3–NE). Of the 3 MSI-H pts, 1 achieved partial response, 1 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease. For non-MSI-H/MMRp pts, ORRWK24 was 50.0% (95% CI, 29.9–70.1). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 32 (59%) pts; there were no Grade 4 TRAEs. 3 (6%) pts discontinued treatment due to a TRAE. The most common TRAEs were hypertension (59%), fatigue (50%), diarrhea (44%), hypothyroidism (35%), and stomatitis (33%). Conclusions: Combination LEN + PEM demonstrated encouraging activity in advanced EC regardless of MSI/MMR status, with no new safety signals identified. A randomized, international, 2-arm, phase 3 study in recurrent EC is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02501096

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Other Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02501096

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 5596)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.5596

Abstract #

5596

Poster Bd #

323

Abstract Disclosures