Induction chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFIRINOX or FOLFOX/FOLFIRI, plus cetuximab (CET) or bevacizumab (BEV) (by RAS status), in patients (pts) with primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): Results of the randomized UNICANCER PRODIGE 14-ACCORD 21 (METHEP-2) trial.

Authors

null

Marc Ychou

Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Marc Ychou , Michel Rivoire , Simon Thezenas , Rosine Guimbaud , Francois Ghiringhelli , Anne Mercier Blas , Laurent Mineur , Eric Francois , Faiza Khemissa , Marion Chauvenet , Yves Bécouarn , Philippe Houyau , Thomas Aparicio , Marie Pierre Galais , Franck Audemar , Eric Assenat , Antoine Adenis , Claire Jouffroy-Zeller , Rene Adam , Olivier Bouche

Organizations

Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, Centre Hospitalier Rangueil, Toulouse, France, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France, Centre Hospitalier Privé de Saint-Grégoire, Saint-Gregoire, France, Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France, CH Saint Jean, Perpignan, France, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France, Clinique Claude Bernard, Albi, France, Hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, Bobigny, France, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France, Centre hospitalier Côte Basque, Bayonne, France, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France, Unicancer, Paris, France, Paul Brousse Hospital, France, Villejuif, France, University Hospital Centre, Reims, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: pts with unresectable CRLM who respond to induction CT allowing curative-intent liver surgery have longer overall survival (OS) than pts who do not. Triplet (3-) or doublets (2-) CT, combined with CET or BEV, are often used in this setting. However, the best CT regimen remains to be determined. Methods: METHEP2 assessed whether 3-CT (FOLFIRINOX) compared to 2-CT (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI), combined with CET or BEV (by KRAS/RAS status), would increase R0/R1 liver-resection rate in pts with initially unresectable CRLM. Randomization was stratified by KRAS (amended to RAS) status, meta- vs. synchronous CRLM, and reason for non-resectability (technical vs. oncological). It was designed to demonstrate a 20% increase in the R0/R1 liver-resection rate (2-CT arm, 50% vs. 3-CT arm, 70%; bilateralα-test, 5%; β, 10%). Results: 256 pts were included, 126 in the 2-CT arm (FOLFIRI, 56; FOLFOX4, 70) and 130 in the 3-CT arm. KRAS and RAS were mutated in 91 pts (35.5%) and in 109 pts (42.6%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 45.6 months (mo), R0/R1 liver resection was achieved in 74/130 pts (56.9%; 95%CI, 48-66) in the 3-CT arm vs. 61/126 pts (48.4%; 95%CI, 39-57) in the 2-CT arm (p = 0.17). The odds for R0/R1 resection were higher in the 3-CT than in the 2-CT arm (OR, 1.8; 95%CI, 1.1-2.7; p < 0.02) when using a logistic regression model adjusted on stratification factors. Median OS was 42.9 mo in the 3-CT arm vs. 37.6 mo in the 2-CT arm (HR = 0.80; 95%CI, 0.56-1.16). Efficacy by targeted agent was as follows: R0/R1 resection 86/153 (56.2%; 95%CI, 48-64) and 49/103 (47.6%; 95%CI, 38-58), objective response: 120/153 (78.4%; 95%CI, 71-85) and 58/103 (56.3%; 95CI, 46-66), mPFS: 12.8 mo (95%CI, 11.6-13.1) and 10.7 mo (95%CI, 9.7-13.1), OS: 43.6 mo (95%CI, 40.0-51.8) and 34.2 mo (95%CI, 27.8-40.4), for CET- and BEV-treated pts, respectively. Conclusions: Despite not reaching our primary objective, FOLFIRINOX tends to be superior to FOLFIRI/FOLFOX, combined with CET or BEV, in terms of R0/R1 liver-resection rate in pts with initially unresectable CRLM. Clinical trial information: NCT01442935

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01442935

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 3535)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.3535

Abstract #

3535

Poster Bd #

28

Abstract Disclosures