Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) retest rate in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) surgical excision specimens.

Authors

null

Lilit Karapetyan

Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

Lilit Karapetyan , Jailan Elayoubi , Seda Grigoryan , Gennady Kuzin , Deimante Tamkus

Organizations

Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI

Research Funding

Other

Background: ER testing in breast DCIS identifies patients who benefit from endocrine manipulation. We hypothesized that ER and PR testing on both biopsy and surgical tumor specimen may increase costs without improving patient outcomes. Methods: We reviewed pathology records of patients diagnosed with DCIS on breast core biopsies that had surgery performed in two community hospitals in Michigan from 2008 to 2016. The association between retesting and categorical variables (testing site, ER/PR expression, grade) was analyzed using a chi-square test. Results: We identified 239 patients who were diagnosed with DCIS on core biopsy and underwent surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy). Average age of diagnosis was 60.5 years. 37.1% cases had grade 3 DCIS and 15% were ER-/PR-. Only one case had ER-/PR+ DCIS. Repeat ER and PR testing was performed in 39.3% of DCIS cases. The rate of repeat testing varied between the hospitals (80/133 and 14/106 cases, p-value < 0.0001). There was no difference in grade 3 DCIS and ER-/PR- DCIS on biopsies between hospitals (17.4% vs 14.1%, p-value = 0.58; 34.8% vs 39.8%, p-value = 0.49 respectively). Repeat testing was performed in both ER and/or PR+ DCIS (38.6%) and ER-/PR- DCIS (51.3%). In regards to hormone receptor expression, there was no difference in retest patterns between two hospitals. However, pathologists in one hospital more often performed repeat testing if high grade DCIS was identified on biopsy (65.2% vs 14.6%, p-value < 0.0001). 4.1% of patients had invasive disease and 6.2% of patients with DCIS underwent bilateral mastectomy. In such cases, initial reflex ER/PR testing on DCIS core biopsy specimens was not necessary. Only one patient had discordant ER/PR results. Conclusions: Our study reports a wide variation of repeat ER/PR testing in breast DCIS in a community setting and confirms a very low discordance rate of ER/PR between biopsy and surgical excision. ER-/PR+ DCIS is a rare entity and questions the role of PR testing in DCIS. The estimated cost of repeat ER/PR testing is $441.76 per case. Avoiding reflex ER/PR testing in DCIS core biopsies and repeat retesting on the surgical specimen will decrease cost of care without compromising patient outcomes.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Care Delivery/Models of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr e18524)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e18524

Abstract #

e18524

Abstract Disclosures