Patient-reported satisfaction with multidisciplinary (MD) v serial care (SC) for lung cancer.

Authors

null

Kenneth Daniel Ward

Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN

Kenneth Daniel Ward , Weiyu Chen , Matthew Smeltzer , Meghan Brooke Meadows , Nicholas Ryan Faris , Courtney Berryman , Bianca M Jackson , Fedoria Rugless , Meredith Ray , Raymond U. Osarogiagbon

Organizations

Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, University of Memphis, School of Public Health, Memphis, TN, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation, Memphis, TN

Research Funding

Other

Background: Coordinated MD lung cancer care, with all key specialists concurrently providing input to develop a consensus care plan with patients and their caregivers, is much-advocated over the usual SC model but lacks rigorous evaluation. Methods: Prospective comparative effectiveness trial enrolled newly-diagnosed lung cancer patients receiving MD or SC within the same US healthcare system. At baseline, 3 and 6 months, patients completed several satisfaction measures from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, and the National Health Interview Survey ‘Perceived Financial Burden of Care’ instrument. All Group (MD v SC), time (baseline, 3, 6 months), and group by time interactions were analyzed in mixed linear models. Associations were adjusted for insurance, race, clinical stage, and ECOG performance status. Results: The 456 patients (159 MD, 297 SC) were similar in sex and health insurance. The MD cohort was slightly older (69 vs. 66) and had more racial minorities (37% vs. 29%). Statistically significant group by time interactions, indicating greater improvement over time for MD, were observed for satisfaction with treatment plan (p = .0036) and quality of care received from the whole care team (p = .0377). However, perceived financial burden of care increased slightly over time for MD but decreased slightly for SC (p = .0352). Collapsed across time, MD patients were more likely to perceive their cancer care to be better than that received by other patients (p = .0025). Collapsed across treatment group, depression increased significantly from baseline to 3 months (p = .0118), and improvements over time occurred for satisfaction with length of time to diagnosis, length of time to complete treatment, and communication from physicians, nurses, and about disease-specific information. Conclusions: Compared with SC, MD patients perceived their care to be better than that received by other lung cancer patients, and had greater improvements over the course of treatment in satisfaction with their treatment plan and care team. These positive patient-reported outcomes occurred despite slightly greater perceived financial burden of care. Clinical trial information: NCT02123797

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Care Delivery/Models of Care

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02123797

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 6535)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.6535

Abstract #

6535

Poster Bd #

361

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Real-world program-based lung cancer care.

First Author: Wei Liao

Abstract

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Prospective comparative effectiveness trial of multidisciplinary lung cancer (LC) care.

First Author: Raymond U. Osarogiagbon

First Author: Jamie S. Ostroff

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Multidisciplinary education and action to foster equitable cancer care.

First Author: Monica Augustyniak