Treatment and outcomes in older women with DCIS: SEER-Medicare 2007-2013.

Authors

null

Mary Chen Schroeder

University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Mary Chen Schroeder , Chen Huang , Karen Marie Winkfield , Akiko Chiba , Lacey R. McNally , Alexandra Thomas

Organizations

University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a low-risk precursor lesion for which hormonal therapy (HT) has been shown in clinical trials to lower risk of subsequent (subs) breast cancer (bc) but not improve overall survival (OS). We report population-based uptake of HT and outcomes by type of local therapy. Methods: SEER-Medicare data identified women (wm) with no comorbidity, ages 66+ and diagnosed 2007-2013 with DCIS as first cancer. Wm were required to have Medicare Parts A, B & D at diagnosis. Treatments were identified with Medicare claims (2007-2014): surgery within 6 months and HT within one year of diagnosis. Outcome and survival analyses included 2007-2009 diagnoses, for adequate follow up. Subs breast events were identified: any bc and ipsilateral invasive bc (ips ibc). Local therapy included NONE, lumpectomy (BCS), BCS with radiation (w/XRT), and mastectomy (MAST). Results: 4,098 wm with DCIS were studied. 40.7% of wm received HT: 26.7% Tamoxifen, 14.0% an aromatase inhibitor. HT use varied by local therapy [BCS (32.8%), BCS w/XRT (52.0%), MAST (28.0%), NONE (19.6%), p < 0.01] but not race [white (40.4%), black (46.3%), other (38.7%), p = 0.13]. More wm ages 66-74 received HT than wm aged 75+ (45.9% v 32.7%, p < 0.01). Outcomes for the full cohort are shown (Table). For wm ages 66-74 outcomes did not differ between those having NONE v any local therapy [5yr OS (95.7% v 96.9%, p = 0.71), subs bc (0% v 4.2%, p = 0.31), subs ips ibc (0% v 1.0%, p = 0.64)]. On multivariate Cox model of wm 66-74, HT was associated with better OS (HR = 0.60, CI: 0.40-0.9992, p = 0.0497) but not marital status or age (66-69 v 70-74, HR = 1.56, p = 0.10); blacks had worse OS than whites (HR = 2.45, p = 0.01). Conclusions: In this large population-based cohort of older wm with DCIS, about half received HT. Wm who received HT had fewer subs bc and superior survival. OS for wm who elected NONE was inferior to those undergoing local therapy, though this was not significant for wm ages 66-74. These findings suggest opportunities remain to improve outcomes for wm with DCIS.

NONE (N = 44)
BCS (N = 408)
BCS w/XRT
(N = 834)
MAST
(N = 393)
p*
No HTHTNo HTHTNo HTHTNo HTHT
Subs bc (%)2.9011.25.33.82.47.60.9< 0.01
Subs ips ibc (%)2.906.13.10.70.20.400.02
5yr OS (%)80.066.789.292.494.795.990.292.30.03

* No HT v HT

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Adjuvant Therapy

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 547)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.547

Abstract #

547

Poster Bd #

39

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts