Safety analysis of an open label, randomized phase 2 study of osimertinib alone versus osimertinib plus carboplatin-pemetrexed for patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progressed during prior epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and which harbors a T790M mutation of EGFR.

Authors

null

Morihito Okada

Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

Morihito Okada , Kentaro Tanaka , Hajime Asahina , Taishi Harada , Kosuke Hamai , Kana Watanabe , Kunihiko Kobayashi , Kenji Sugio , Satoshi Oizumi , Isamu Okamoto

Organizations

Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, First Department of Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Kyushu Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan, Department of Thoracic and Breast Surgery, Oita University, Oita, Japan, Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with NSCLC positive for activating and T790M mutations of EGFR after failure of prior EGFR-TKI treatment. The efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy has been unknown. Methods: This open label, randomized phase 2 study enrolls adults with clinical stage IIIB or IV or postoperative recurrent NSCLC harboring activating and T790M mutations of EGFR after prior EGFR-TKI treatment failure. Patients are randomly assigned to receive osimertinib (80 mg/day) alone or in combination with carboplatin-pemetrexed (area under the curve of 5 and 500 mg/m2, respectively, on day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary end point is progression-free survival. A safety review of the first treatment course by an independent data monitoring committee was planned after enrollment of 12 patients in each arm. Results: As of 27 November 2017, 24 patients (median age, 67 years [range, 46–80]; 58.3% male; 83.3% stage IV; 100% adenocarcinoma; 58.3% exon-19 deletion and 41.7% L858R mutations of EGFR; 54.2% never-smokers) had been assigned equally to the two arms and received the protocol treatment at least once. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in all patients. One such event of grade (G) ≥3 (decreased neutrophil count of G3) occurred in the osimertinib arm, whereas four episodes each of decreased white blood cell count, decreased neutrophil count, decreased platelet count, and anemia of G3 or G4; two episodes of skin rash of G3; and one episode each of bronchial infection, oral mucositis, hypertension, and hypokalemia of G3 occurred in the combination arm. The event frequency in the combination arm was similar to that in previous studies of carboplatin-pemetrexed. Exaggeration of adverse events by osimertinib or previously unobserved events were not apparent in the combination arm. Conclusions: The combination treatment was safe in the selected patient population. Clinical trial information: 000024438.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Lung Cancer-Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

000024438

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr e21073)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e21073

Abstract #

e21073

Abstract Disclosures