Transcriptomic and immunophenotypic profiles of melanoma tissue from patients (pts) treated with anti-PD-1 +/- ipilimumab to define mechanisms of response and resistance.

Authors

null

Tuba Nur Gide

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Tuba Nur Gide , Camelia Quek , Alexander M. Menzies , Jason Madore , Rebecca Velickovic , Matthew Wongchenko , Yibing Yan , Matteo S. Carlino , Alexander David Guminski , Robyn Saw , Ines Silva , Umaimainthan Palendira , John F. Thompson , Richard A. Scolyer , Georgina V. Long , James S. Wilmott

Organizations

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade improves the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma, but many patients fail to respond to immunotherapy and the lack of accurate predictors of response or progression remains a major clinical problem. We investigated potential mechanisms of response and resistance to anti-PD1 +/- ipilimumab. Methods: 141 melanoma biopsies from advanced melanoma pts treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n= 54), or anti-PD1 + ipilimumab (n= 51) were classified as responders (CR/PR/SD > 6 mo) or non-responders (SD≤6 mo/PD) based on RECIST. The transcriptomic and immunophenotypic profiles of 105 baseline (PRE) and 36 early-during treatment (EDT) tumor biopsies from pts treated with monotherapy (n= 33 responders, n= 21 non-responders) or anti-PD-1 + ipilimumab (n= 38 responders, n= 13 non-responders) were characterized via RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence. Results: Responders to monotherapy displayed increased expression of genes associated with a Type 1 interferon response, tissue-resident T-cells and drug targets (TIGIT, ADAR, ADORA2A, CD137, IDO1 and LAG3) (diff. p < 0.05). Genes unique to anti-PD-1 + ipilimumab responders included T-cell and NK-cell genes EOMES, CD48, CD96, and FASLG. Non-responders displayed significantly higher expression of genes associated with WNT signaling along with novel hypoxic and metabolic pathways, including CA9 and NABP1 (p < 0.05). Non-responders with high CD8/PD-L1 densities expressed novel immune drug targets (IDO1 expressed by 37% of monotherapy non-responders, ICOS (37%), TNFRSF9 (26%), LAG3 (16%), TIGIT (16%) and ADORA2A (16%)). In contrast, TIL-low tumors displayed a lack of expression of the aforementioned targets (42% of monotherapy and 86% of anti-PD-1 + ipilimumab non-responders). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that combinations of novel drug targets may provide clinical benefits in non-responding and non-CR responding patients with high TILs. TIL-low non-responders may require modulation of WNT, hypoxic and metabolic pathways to overcome resistance, facilitating the development of novel synergistic drug targets.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Biologic Correlates

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 9518)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.9518

Abstract #

9518

Poster Bd #

345

Abstract Disclosures