Randomised phase II study with cetuximab in combination with 5-FU and cisplatin or carboplatin versus cetuximab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for treatment of patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CETMET trial).

Authors

Signe Friesland

Signe Friesland

Dep. of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Signe Friesland , Georgios Tsakonas , Claus Kristensen , Maria Herlestam Calero Moren , Hedda Haugen , Karin Soderstrom , Lena Specht

Organizations

Dep. of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy with cetuximab is the standard of care for relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The aim of this trial was to investigate whether cetuximab and paclitaxel/carboplatin can achieve similar progression free survival (PFS) with less toxicity compared to standard cetuximab and 5-FU/platinum based chemotherapy. Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial, 85 patients with relapsed or metastatic SCCHN were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to cetuximab and 5-FU/cisplatin or carboplatin (arm A, n = 42), versus cetuximab and paclitaxel/carboplatin (arm B, n = 43). Patients without disease progression continued with cetuximab maintenance every second week until progression or toxicity. Eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0–1, and adequate organ functions. The primary endpoint was to investigate whether PFS in arm B is non-inferior to PFS in arm A using a liberal non-inferiority margin of 1.5 for the PFS hazard ratio (HR). Results: The median age for the whole study population was 60.9 years with a male predominance (69.4%). Clinically significant parameters, such as tumour localization, tumour stage, PS, HPV status and age were well balanced between the two treatment arms. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more frequent in arm A than in arm B (60% vs 40%; p = 0.034). Median PFS in arm A was 4.37 months (95% CI: 2.9- 5.9 m) and 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.8-8.2 m) in arm B, (p = 0.064). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.3-11.5 m) in arm A and 10.2 months (95% CI: 5.4-15 m) in arm B (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.43-1.16). PFS HR for arm B was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.41- 1.03) and the predefined non-inferiority criterion was met. Conclusions: Cetuximab and paclitaxel/carboplatin was found to have similar efficacy and less toxicity compared to cetuximab and 5-FU/cisplatin or carboplatin. The experimental arm is easier to administer rendering it a favourable alternative to standard therapy in daily clinical practice. Clinical trial information: NCT01830556

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01830556

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 6032)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.6032

Abstract #

6032

Poster Bd #

20

Abstract Disclosures