Treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) directed by a comprehensive molecular tumour analysis program (CMTA).

Authors

null

Serge Leyvraz

Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany

Serge Leyvraz , Thomas Kessler , Moritz Schütte , Mario Lamping , Susen Burock , Sebastian Ochsenreither , Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy , Christoph Wierling , Korinna Jöhrens , Frederick Klauschen , Caroline-Anna Peuker , Felix Kiecker , Reinhold Schäfer , Bodo Lange , Hans Lehrach , Antonia Joussen , Damian Tobias Rieke , Konrad Friedrich Klinghammer , Ulrich Keilholz , Marie-Laure Yaspo

Organizations

Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany, Alacris Theranostics GmbH, Berlin, Germany, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany, Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, Departement of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, Dermatology Department, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, Eye Clinic, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, Charite Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany

Research Funding

Other

Background: There is a lack of active treatment against mUM. Such “hard-to-treat” tumour might benefit from treatment decisions driven by a complete genomic and transcriptomic analysis program. Methods: From 1.3.2016 to 1.12.2017, mUM were included in the prospective TREAT20Plus study and were subjected to a CMTA including WGS, WES, RNAseq, cell culture and systems biological/pharmacodynamic modelling. Treatment recommendations were made by a molecular tumour board. Results: Twenty six patients (12 F, 14M). Age: 61 (32-80). PS: 0 (0-2). Metastases: 4 (1-10). Abnormal LDH: 19. Pre-treatment: 1 (0-5) and type: iv chemotherapy: 11, checkpoint-inhibitors (-i): 7, intra-hepatic: 13, vaccine: 1. Insufficient material in 3 patients. The mutation burden was low: 32 (15-449). The treatment recommendations (TRec) were based on the different mutations or activation profiles: A) MEK-i. for mutations of GNAQ: 11, GNA11: 13. B) a MET-i. for MET overexpression: 17. ALK-i. for the oncogenic ALKATI isoform: 3. C) CDK4/6-i. for CDKN2A loss: 1. D) checkpoint-i. for mutation burden > 100: 3. E) For the other alterations no off-label treatment was available: mutation of BAP1: 8 or SF3B1: 10, overexpression of MYC: 14, BCL2: 24, CCND2: 16, ERBB3: 5 , biallelic loss of TNFAIP3: 1. Among novel non-recurring gene-fusions: inactivating gene fusion affecting MITF: 1. In 1 patient repeated biopsies at time of recurrence after MEK-i disclosed biallelic loss of CDKN2A. The pharmacodynamic modeling confirmed TREc in 10 and helped with the decision in 8 patients. A treatment was initiated in 15 patients: Trametinib: 6, Cabozantinib: 3, Crizotinib: 6, Palbociclib: 1. A treatment was not initiated for 8 patients: 4 too early, 4 rapid progression. Among the 12 evaluable patients the antitumor response was: minor response: 2, stable disease: 4, progressive disease: 5, too early: 1. Median PFS of the treated patients: 5,5 months. Conclusions: Precision medicine in mUM is clinically feasible. It leads to a better understanding of the biology of the tumour and of the potential therapeutic targets. Its clinical efficacy is limited by the non-availability of drugs as single agent or in combination. Clinical trial information: EA4/063/13.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

EA4/063/13

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 9566)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.9566

Abstract #

9566

Poster Bd #

393

Abstract Disclosures