Precision neoadjuvant therapy (P-NAT): A planned interim analysis of a randomized, TNBC enrolling trial to confirm molecular profiling improves survival (ARTEMIS).

Authors

Stacy Moulder

Stacy L. Moulder

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Stacy L. Moulder , Kenneth R. Hess , Rosalind P Candelaria , Gaiane M Rauch , Lumarie Santiago , Beatriz Adrada , Wei Tse Yang , Michael Z Gilcrease , Lei Huo , Michael Charles Stauder , Banu Arun , Rachel M. Layman , Rashmi Krishna Murthy , Senthil Damodaran , Naoto T. Ueno , Alastair Mark Thompson , Bora Lim , Elizabeth A. Mittendorf , Jennifer Keating Litton , William Fraser Symmans

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, The Ohio State University Medical Center James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of TX, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other

Background: ARTEMIS is a double blind, randomized trial to determine if P-NAT impacts rates of excellent pathologic response [Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) 0-I]. P-NAT used a CLIA-certified chemosensitivity mRNA gene signature (GES) and subtyping of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to select targeted therapy (TT) trials for chemo insensitive tumors. Methods: ARTEMIS planned to randomize 360 TNBC patients (pts) 2:1 to ‘know’ vs. ‘not know’ P-NAT results using a group sequential design with one-sided O’Brien-Fleming boundaries and two interim tests for futility and superiority; overall α set at .05 with 80% power to detect improved RCB 0-1 rate from 50% to 64%. After biopsy, pts began a planned 4 cycles of Adriamycin-based chemo (AC). Volumetric change by ultrasound (US) upon completion of AC (or at progression) combined with GES results (if known) determined sensitivity using a protocol defined algorithm. Pts with sensitive disease received subsequent taxane-based (T) therapy. Pts with insensitive disease were offered phase II trials (TT; table) using IHC results, if known. To gauge impact of TT independently from GES, pts having < 50% volumetric reduction by US to AC were evaluated (US-resistant cohort). Results: The first interim analysis (n = 133 pts with RCB status) revealed a RCB 0-1 rate of 56% (know P-NAT) v 62% (not know P-NAT); p = 1.0; thus, randomization was discontinued for futility. In total 232 pts were enrolled; 168 evaluable for RCB. In the US-resistant cohort (n = 43), RCB 0-I rates were higher in pts treated with TT (n = 30) v AC-T (n = 13); (30% v 8%; odds ratio = 5.1 with 95% CI = (0.6-45.7); Fisher’s exact test 1-sided p-value = 0.11). Conclusions: GES failed to improve rates of RCB 0-I in TNBC; however, in pts with resistant disease identified by US after AC, RCB 0-I rates were higher in pts treated with targeted therapy compared to chemo alone. Clinical trial information: NCT02276443

RegimenEntry criteria (IHC)# pts treated
Atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxelNone19
Panitumumab + paclitaxel + carboplatinNone14
Liposomal doxorubicin + bevacizumab + everolimusVimentin > / = 50% or metaplastic12
Enzalutamide + paclitaxelAndrogen receptor > / = 10%11
AC-TNone153

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Neoadjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02276443

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 518)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.518

Abstract #

518

Poster Bd #

10

Abstract Disclosures