Comparison between lobaplatin and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial.

Authors

null

Kuiyuan Liu

Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

Kuiyuan Liu , Wei-Xiong Xia , Wen-Ze Qiu , Ya-Hui Yu , Guo-Ying Liu , Hu Liang , Wang-Zhong Li , Shu-Hui Lv , Liang-Ru Ke , Hao-Yuan Mo , Guo Ling , Ming-Yuan Chen , Ka-Jia Cao , Chong Zhao , Chao-Nan Qian , Xing Lv , Xiang Yanqun , Xiang Guo , Xin-Jun Huang

Organizations

Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

Research Funding

Other

Background: Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy(CRT) has been widely applied as a first-line regimen in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). However, cisplatin can induce severe side effects .Our previous phase II trial revealed that lobaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) showed encouraging anti-tumor effects with tolerable toxicities for LA-NPC. Here, we assess the efficacy and toxicities of a regimen of lobaplatin versus cisplatin plus 5-FU as induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by concomitant lobaplatin versus cisplatin with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods: Stage III-IVB NPC patients were randomly assigned to receive lobaplatin or cisplatin plus 5-FU as ICT followed by CCRT. In the lobaplatin arm, patients received lobaplatin at a dose of 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22 combined with a continuous 120-h intravenous injection of 5-FU at a dose of 4 g/m2 followed by lobaplatin at a dose of 30 mg/m2 on days 43 and 64 concomitant with IMRT. Lobaplatin was replaced by cisplatin (100mg/m2) in the cisplatin arm. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 494 eligible patients, 250 were assigned to lobaplatin arm and 244 to cisplatin arm. No difference was observed in overall tumor response between two arms (98.6% vs. 97.7%, P= 0.459). After a median follow-up of 42.6 months, no statistically significant differences in 3-year PFS rate was observed between two arms (PFS: 78.9% vs. 82.0%, P= 0.985). During ICT, more patients suffered grade 3-4 leucopenia, neutropenia, nausea and vomiting in cisplatin arm (all P< 0.001). During CCRT, grade 3-4 anemia, nausea and vomiting were more common in cisplatin arm (all P< 0.001). Conclusions: The regimen of ICT with lobaplatin plus 5-FU followed by concomitant lobaplatin and IMRT achieved similar survival outcomes with less acute toxicity compared to cisplatin-based CRT in LA-NPC. Long-term follow up is required to determine whether lobaplatin-based systemic chemotherapy should be the first line of therapy for LA-NPC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-TRC-13003285.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ChiCTR-TRC-13003285

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 6029)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.6029

Abstract #

6029

Poster Bd #

17

Abstract Disclosures